Email address
[email protected]Contact number
+55-11-3147-2862Share profile
Band 5
Provided by Arthur Gonzalez Cronemberger Parente
Litigation & Arbitration;
Arthur is a specialist in business disputes. He focuses his practice on international and domestic arbitration, court litigation and pre-litigation negotiations involving commercial and corporate disputes and M&A transactions. Arthur is regularly called upon by shareholders, boards of directors and executives to assist with conflicts related to corporate governance. Prior to concentrating primarily on disputes, Arthur worked for years as a corporate lawyer, specializing in corporate and M&A transactions. He previously worked at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in Paris and at Boies Schiller Flexner in New York. Arthur is one of the founders and a former president of the Columbia International Arbitration Association in New York.
English;
Portuguese;
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
Bachelor of Laws
Columbia Law School, New York, USA.
Master of Laws (LL.M.)
Provided by Chambers
Arthur Gonzalez Cronemberger Parente is a lawyer with a track record of activity in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings. He's particularly skilled in sensitive M&A-related disputes.
Provided by Chambers
He's really bright and business-minded. He gets the economic reasons behind decisions and can think of solutions that work from both a legal and commercial angle.
Arthur is a lawyer very accustomed to deal with high-profile, high-value matters for big clients.
Arthur presented innovative solutions in a simple and objective way for the litigation in question, demonstrating adequate knowledge in the face of the complexity of the subject.
He's really bright and business-minded. He gets the economic reasons behind decisions and can think of solutions that work from both a legal and commercial angle.
Arthur is a lawyer very accustomed to deal with high-profile, high-value matters for big clients.
Arthur presented innovative solutions in a simple and objective way for the litigation in question, demonstrating adequate knowledge in the face of the complexity of the subject.
