Fraud: Civil

David is hyper-analytical, very clever and very insightful.

David is easy to work with, industrious, precise and helpful.

He is a very solid silk that gets stuck in.

Philip has the gravitas and the experience, and he carries it off to deals with some very difficult situations with panache. There aren't many like him at the Bar.

Philip is the guy I call upon when the stakes are high. He provides two ideal qualities: he's very strategic and collegiate in court, but he's also a street fighter when he needs to be.

He is a skilful and forceful advocate, ferociously bright and very dependable.

He is an excellent analyst with a super brain.

Adil is technically brilliant. He's a real brain and yet has a really nice manner. Underestimate him at your peril!

He's unbelievably bright but he is great at working in a team and really gets stuck in. He understands commercial fraud really, really well.

Hugh is a very polished advocate and reads the court brilliantly. He really understands fraud cases, and has a wealth of experience and a delightful style with clients. He is great on strategy.

He talks to all sorts of clients in a way they understand. He gets to the nub of the matter quickly, the quality of his written work is very high and he is a good advocate in court.

Hugh is very sage and provides extremely sound and tactically smart advice.

He understands working in a team and is commercial and team-oriented.

Jonathan is very good and lovely to work with. He doesn't get thrown by the ups and downs of litigation.

Jonathan is never afraid to roll his sleeves up. He has a great combination of a fine legal mind, great judgement and a fighting spirit. Clients really warm to his engaging style.

Jonathan is a strong advocate who is effective in fending off opponents' attacks. He is laser-focused on what will move the judge, aware of client pressures and works hard to make himself available.

She is superb at strategy while having a command of the detail. She provides excellent service by responding promptly and pushing the team hard while remaining engaging and enjoyable to work with.

Elizabeth is a fantastic leader with great strategic insights. She is always clear, incisive and inspires confidence in clients.

James is very caring and supportive of the client and a real member of the team. His written work and advocacy is good.

Justin gives sound, sensible advice and gets to the nub of the issues. He is very good at seeing the wood from the trees.

Justin is spectacularly user-friendly and a real team player. He is smart and flexible.

His advocacy is really impressive. He is smooth and persuasive.

He is hard-working, bright and a great team player.

Marc is brilliant. He is all over the facts and good with the legal arguments. He is creative, tenacious and tactical.

Marc is a fantastic junior to have on a complex case. He is a very gifted technical lawyer and he works extremely hard.

He can hold his own, and he's thorough and great to work with. His advocacy is very good; he can be measured or feisty if he needs to. He works through things systematically to get the judge on side.

Simon has a great breadth of expertise and brings a real understanding of significant disputes. His written work is second to none and he is skilled at putting complex legal matters into simple terms.

Dan is a gifted advocate. charming and very insightful.

Dan is exceptionally intelligent and shows good commercial judgement. He is a very good advocate, knows the law extremely well and is able to apply it. He's also very friendly and easy to work with.

He is so clever, very commercial and great with lay clients. He is brilliant in the courtroom and has a real punch about him.

Dan is really perceptive and fights the client's corner. He is a brilliant lawyer and very creative.

He is very persuasive but also great at analysing and distilling large amounts of information. He doesn't shy away from key issues in his advocacy, which is direct and focused, sharp and persuasive.

Gareth is great to deal with, superb on the law and very pragmatic. He has good judgement and is a good drafter too.

Gareth deploys his seemingly encyclopedic knowledge of the case law with great dexterity and commercial awareness.

Gareth is bright, hard-working and personable.

Paul is super forensic and has an easy manner with the court. He has a very modern, conversational style and is a natural advocate.

His recall is amazing and he works at astonishing speed, turning out polished pleadings and letters.

Paul is tactically astute, incredibly collaborative and really commercial. He totally gets the client's situation and is quickly able work a way through.

Paul is very responsive and really on top of very complex factual detail. He is good on his feet and gets to the point.

Stephanie is fantastic and is super bright. She is absolutely lovely to work with and really impressive.

Stephanie is a very smart barrister who handles questions with good strategy.

Stephanie is organised and practical. She adapts well and knows when to push back against judges.

Charlotte gets quickly stuck in on details and is really excellent in the drafting of evidence applications. She is incredibly easy to work with, friendly, bright and confident.

Matthew is very detailed, thorough and always willing to talk through the issues and find solutions.

Matt is very good at making himself available and very commercially astute, anticipating the longer game. He offers outside-the-box thinking that benefits the client.