Fraud: Civil

He is an absolute powerhouse.

Adrian has substantial gravitas and is very good.

He is a very experienced trial silk who has a banking background and is very good in that context.

He's brilliant, decisive and a real leader. I think he's at the very top of the fraud litigation tree.

He is a great orator and very charming with clients. He gives them frank advice.

Ali understands how judges will see things and can explain it simply.

He is a formidable advocate, smooth with the client and practical with the instructing solicitors.

He is particularly good in writing and in oral advocacy.

David is very commercial, a very hard opponent and someone I want on my side.

He's popular, user-friendly and good on his feet.

David is really user-friendly and commercial. He is persuasive and has a particularly easy manner in court.

David bridges the gap between civil fraud and insolvency like few others.

David is amazing. He is a very persuasive advocate with a very conversational style.

Adam is very good at deciding what the best option is. He's smart and commercial, and good at identifying key points and working out how to manage those points. He is adept in complex cases.

He is brilliant. He very measured and excellent at dealing with clients. He has a strong strategic brain and stays ten steps ahead of everyone else.

James is hugely hard-working, always on top of the detail and always thinks ahead. He is super strategic.

James is very bright, responsive and hard-working. He's very creative and very good at drafting. He's superb.

James is strategically good, is very clear and presents well in his submissions.

Lisa is an excellent and industrious junior who is a joy to work with. She is really good on paper and her advocacy is excellent.

Philip Hinks is very bright and impressive.

Philip punches above his weight in strategy and is very good to work with.

Timothy is highly bright, with an unequalled appetite for work.

Yash brings a fresh perspective on problems and rises to a challenge. You can trust him to do a clear advice and he's an extremely nice guy to work with.

David is excellent. He has a measured, calm and controlled style. He is an excellent cross-examiner who is always on top of his strategy.

'Clever' doesn't do him justice and he's a joy to work with.

Georges is very good with facts. A real strength is that he spent several years as an associate, which means he understands how law firms work and how to deal with the wider team.

Georges brings value to every case he does. He works very well on disclosure.

He's an impressive and tenacious advocate.

He has a confident and assured manner both in his oral advocacy and in his advisory work. He doesn't shy away from difficult points or challenges, from the Bench or from his opponents.

Matthew really leads from the front, clearly sets out what should be done and engages with the detail. He's always been very good at getting up to speed quickly and giving clear and practical advice.

Peter is a clear thinker with an excellent ability to apply complex legal concepts on the fly. He is extremely responsive and friendly to deal with.

He is second to none on complex issues in securities litigation. He provides fantastic advocacy. He doesn't beat around the bush and gets to the point well.

Rajesh very quickly gets on top of the issues and is thus able to present a compelling and succinct case.

Rajesh marshals his teams very well. He is commercial in his approach, with a forensic eye for detail. An all-rounder, his advocacy is forceful but smooth.

Rajesh is incredibly user-friendly. He is able to hear all of the detail but distil what is important. His advocacy is very good and his cross-examination is very effective.

Will is a superstar. He couples a brilliant mind for technical and strategic issues with outstanding client-handling skills. I would instruct him on anything.

William is intellectually brilliant and I was really impressed with his ability to master very difficult points of law in a short period. A star of the future.

Will is well liked and trusted by the silk teams he works with and is very commercial and knowledgeable. The breadth of his legal knowledge is phenomenal and his advocacy is very fluent.

Emmanuel is collaborative and easy to work with. He is an excellent drafter who can provide succinct and clear technical submissions.

Emmanuel is calm and measured in court and is alive to the subtle tactical points. He can really charm a judge.

He is extraordinarily good, experienced well beyond his call and a future star. He is brilliantly clever and thinks widely around any issue.

Ryan is exceptional. He operates far beyond his level of call. His drafting and written advocacy is excellent.

Ryan is very nice, very hard-working and a creative thinker who is interested in using novel ideas to get out of difficult situations.

Ryan is almost unparalleled. He can see 50 moves ahead in a way I haven't seen in someone so junior.

Saaman is excellent. He's very responsive and client-friendly and on top of all the detail.

Saaman is calm, efficient and a good drafter.

Chloë is really bright, personable and cool. She can run circles around people.

Clarissa gets on top of things quickly.

Clarissa is a very good baby barrister. She is hard-working and delivers the goods.

Ravi gives good practical and commercial advice and takes a very sensible approach. He is good at delving into detail and identifying key issues. He has a very good style of oral advocacy.

Ravi has excellent drafting skills and is very adept at distilling complex claims into concise particulars.

Ravi provides very good advice coupled with a commercial and practical approach.

Ravi is all over the detail and is willing to proffer his own view. He is very proactive.