Email address
[email protected]Contact number
(+55) 11 3356 1679Share profile
Band 3
Provided by Daniel Oliveira Andreoli
Competition
Partner in Demarest's Competition practice, Daniel Oliveira Andreoli holds a master's degree in Corporate and Competition Law approved with merit in European and English Competition Law from King's College (University of London) and a Bachelor of Laws degree from PUC-SP. He has more than 18 years of experience acting in complex antitrust cases, representing a wide variety of domestic and international companies in concentration acts and in investigations initiated by the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE). He has solid experience in negotiating and drafting leniency agreements, as well as cease and desist and merger control agreements. Daniel acts together with companies in competitive risk diagnostics, as well as formatting and implementing antitrust compliance programs. He represents clients in unilateral conduct investigations involving allegations of abuse of dominant position. He is also a speaker at numerous events related to the area and has published articles on the topic of competition in local and international publications.
Member of the International Bar Association (IBA) Unilateral Conduct Working Group, among others. More can be found on the Demarest website.
Author of numerous articles related to competition and antitrust law. More can be found on the Demarest website.
Provided by Chambers
Daniel Oliveira Andreoli is highlighted by sources for his solid expertise dealing with complex competition and antitrust mandates, including leniency agreements and merger reviews.
Provided by Chambers
Daniel has a great holistic view, with deep knowledge of the local and foreign antitrust scenario. He has an outstanding ethical conduct, always acting very quickly.
Daniel was always very agile and straightforward in our interactions. He was also always available, and gave us the necessary peace of mind.
Daniel has a great holistic view, with deep knowledge of the local and foreign antitrust scenario. He has an outstanding ethical conduct, always acting very quickly.
Daniel was always very agile and straightforward in our interactions. He was also always available, and gave us the necessary peace of mind.