Department profile
8 New Square

Intellectual Property

UK Bar Guide 2026 : London (Bar)


8 New Square

Rankings

Chambers Review

Provided by Chambers

Intellectual Property - London (Bar)

Band 1

Band 1


What the Team is Known For

8 New Square is an outstanding IP set, home to top-flight barristers who are consistently instructed in the biggest cases in the field. One interviewee says: "They are simply the best IP set around," while another notes that 8 New Square has "a huge amount of experience and a very talented pool of barristers". The chambers has extensive patent expertise ranging from matters concerning key innovations in pharmaceuticals to major TMT FRAND cases, with Regeneron and Bayer v Formycon, Amgen and Samsung Bioepis, Pfizer v Uniqure and Interdigital v Oppo being among numerous impressive examples. Members are also well equipped to handle trade mark, copyright and design disputes for their impressive client list.

Ben Newham is chambers director.

Strengths

Provided by Chambers

  • It's the best clerking team out there. Nick Wise is absolutely brilliant. He is an absolute star who gets everything done.

    Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • The clerking team are great. Phil Taylor in particular is very responsive and good.

    Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • The clerking is very good. They are good at managing everyone and dealing with courts. They are top notch. Ben Newham and Nick Wise are very effective.

    Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • The clerks are great. They are responsive, helpful and approachable.

    Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar

Notable Practitioners

Provided by Chambers

  • Star IndividualsAdrian Speck
    Star IndividualsAdrian Speck

    Adrian Speck

    Adrian Speck KC is a technically brilliant, practical and commercially-minded barrister recognised for representing telecommunications companies in high-value patent litigation. His other areas of expertise include second-use medical claims and trade mark infringement actions involving online vendors. He maintains an excellent reputation for his advocacy both at first instance and in appellate proceedings.

    • Adrian demonstrates complete commitment to the client's cause.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Adrian Speck KC is on everyone's shortlist. He is an absolute star who is always in demand for the biggest cases.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Adrian is extraordinarily intelligent. He is thoughtful and considerate, and he is very in tune with what judges think.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Star IndividualsAndrew Lykiardopoulos
    Star IndividualsAndrew Lykiardopoulos

    Andrew Lykiardopoulos

    Andrew Lykiardopoulos KC is a popular silk who is consistently praised by instructing solicitors for his client-facing skills and his willingness to get to grips with the technical details of IP litigation. He is regularly called upon for high-end patent litigation involving TMT and pharmaceutical companies, as well as for ground-breaking FRAND litigation.

    • My go-to person is Andrew Lykiardopoulos for FRAND and RAND. He's excellent at running difficult arguments and very good at putting his all into difficult points. He is an absolute star of this area.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Andrew is a go-to KC for patent matters in any area of technology. He is super smart and pragmatic, and he is fun to work with.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He is very impressive on his feet.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Star IndividualsDaniel Alexander
    Star IndividualsDaniel Alexander

    Daniel Alexander

    Daniel Alexander KC is a market-leading silk who enjoys an exceptional reputation for his advocacy in patent litigation involving pharmaceutical and TMT companies. His experience includes handling novel appellate actions arising from inventorship claims. He is consistently involved in cases that establish precedent in areas including patent infringement and licensing.

    • Daniel is very statesmanlike in the way he does submissions. He sits as a deputy judge and he really knows when to push judges.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He is smooth and good at answering difficult questions from the Bench.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • We instruct him on the difficult cases that require detailed thinking. He is an exceptional advocate who has the ear of the judges at the Court of Appeal and at first-instance courts.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 1Charlotte May KC
    Band 1Charlotte May KC

    Charlotte May KC

    Charlotte May KC is a leading IP silk praised for her skilful, measured advocacy, including before the Supreme Court, and admired for the quality of her client care and commerciality. Her broad practice covers TMT and pharmaceutical patent disputes and cutting-edge trade mark infringement issues relating to the obligations of retailers and digital platforms. She is also frequently instructed in cases concerning media copyright disputes. May is regarded as a leading authority on supplementary protection certificates.

    • She is a very fair and measured advocate and always extremely well prepared. She has full command of the paperwork.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Charlotte May KC is always across the details of a case and is very user-friendly.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Charlotte has a really good technical background and is very organised. We have been working on a multiparty dispute with her, and she has been very impressive on that.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 1Isabel Jamal
    Band 1Isabel Jamal

    Isabel Jamal

    Isabel Jamal is an extremely conscientious and talented IP barrister who impresses instructing parties with her commercial focus and responsiveness. She is recommended for her experience acting in high-value litigation connected with pharmaceutical, telecommunications and engineering patents. She also excels in cases concerning design rights and copyrights. She has appeared in numerous precedent-setting cases before the Supreme Court and has recently tackled a number of actions relating to FRAND licensing.

    • Isabel is a standout barrister who would be my first choice. She is hard-working, intelligent and a great team player. She is also strategic and willing to see the bigger picture.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Isabel is super bright and bubbling with energy and thoughts. I use her as a junior for advocacy on cases as she has a lot of credibility with judges already.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Isabel Jamal is fantastic. She is really bright, detailed and engaged.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 1Jaani Riordan
    Band 1Jaani Riordan

    Jaani Riordan

    Jaani Riordan is particularly well known for his deep expertise in the law on the liability of internet service providers and other intermediaries, in cases of trade mark and copyright infringement online. He also has notable experience in patent litigation in the telecommunications and pharmaceutical sectors, and has undertaken work in cases of considerable importance in the area of standard-essential patent licensing.

    • Jaani Riordan is a really fantastic advocate who is incredibly bright. He is a leading barrister in his area.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • His strengths include that he did a joint computing degree, so he is knowledgeable about such things, which has been great. He is bright and hard-working and brings value to cases.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • His knowledge of the real complexities of IP law is really outstanding. Jaani is really well known. Everybody fights to get him because he's a junior but he's absolutely brilliant.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 1James Whyte
    Band 1James Whyte

    James Whyte

    James Whyte is a technically brilliant IP barrister with a background in the biotechnology field. He is also noted for his abilities representing electronics and telecommunications clients in patent infringement claims. Additionally, he is frequently instructed in patent invalidation actions and litigation involving supplementary protection certificates. He acts in patent cases at appellate level as well as at first instance.

    • He did an excellent job on a very commercially sensitive cross-examination. He was very measured and handled it all very well, working in a very thoughtful and precise way.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He is calm, measured and thorough, with a towering intellect. He also codes, which can be extremely useful in hi-tech or computer science patent cases.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • James Whyte is brilliant. He is an incredibly thoughtful, considered and well-prepared barrister.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 1Justin Turner
    Band 1Justin Turner

    Justin Turner

    Justin Turner KC is a leading intellectual property barrister with a strong technical background in the life sciences sector and substantial experience in biotechnology patent litigation. He has also acted in soft IP disputes arising in the pharmaceutical industry. He earns praise for his strong courtroom presentation, especially with regard to cross-examination.

    • He is brilliant and super smart. The best thing is his biochemistry background; he really understands his stuff. He is excellent.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Justin Turner KC is very good. He knows the detail and the science. He knows how it all works.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Justin Turner KC is very knowledgeable in life sciences.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 1Michael Tappin KC
    Band 1Michael Tappin KC

    Michael Tappin KC

    Michael Tappin KC enjoys an excellent reputation for his courtroom presentation and capabilities in handling highly technical life sciences patent disputes such as revocation attempts and infringement claims. He is also noted for his experience acting in TMT patent infringement cases. He is consistently praised by instructing solicitors for his outstanding command of detail.

    • Michael Tappin KC is a determined and conscientious advocate who is hugely respected by judges and feared by opponents.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Michael Tappin is fantastically clever. He has a real attention to detail in looking at the way the case fits together. He is a great strategist and a really good advocate. He is absolutely excellent.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Michael Tappin KC is excellent. He is impactful as an advocate, gets completely into the detail and doesn't put a foot wrong ever. He gets results.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 2Henry Ward
    Band 2Henry Ward

    Henry Ward

    Henry Ward is an impressive barrister who is highlighted for his realistic and commercial advice and his innovative approach to IP litigation. He is recognised for his skill in patent infringement and invalidation claims in the telecommunications, pharmaceutical and engineering sectors. He has also appeared in parallel import and trade mark disputes.

    • Henry Ward is a great junior who combines technical excellence with a commercial understanding of what a client needs.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Henry Ward is absolutely superb. He is a details man with incredible knowledge.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He has the ability to focus on what matters. He provides targeted and strategic advice. He is excellent.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 2James Abrahams
    Band 2James Abrahams

    James Abrahams

    James Abrahams KC is commended for his extremely efficient, tenacious and forthright advocacy and the depth of his experience acting in TMT patent litigation. He is also experienced assisting with trade mark infringement and database rights disputes. His recent activity includes pharmaceutical patent injunction proceedings, and his patent expertise extends to various other industries including manufacturing and shipping.

    • I have been incredibly impressed with him. He was really excellent. He is very good under pressure and willing to persuade a court that starts out completely against him.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • James Abrahams KC is someone you want on your side for a fight. He puts the case across forcefully and is a really strong advocate.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • James is very good on his feet.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 2Lindsay Lane
    Band 2Lindsay Lane

    Lindsay Lane

    Lindsay Lane KC is a well-regarded silk highlighted for her pragmatic advice and efficiency. She is regularly instructed in relation to claims for patent, trade mark and database rights infringement. Her additional expertise takes in cases involving unregistered and registered designs.

    • Lindsay is excellent. She is a very user-friendly barrister who is extremely bright, practical and commercial. She is a real joy to use.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Lindsay Lane KC has a great eye for the points that matter and is very good with clients.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Lindsay Lane KC is really good. She is a good judge reader, and gets where the response and reaction should be.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 2Michael Conway
    Band 2Michael Conway

    Michael Conway

    Michael Conway comes recommended for his patent practice and is notable for his activity in FRAND-related disputes. He is building an active profile through his representation of pharmaceutical and biotech companies, as well as those in the telecommunications industry.

    • Michael Conway is a star of the IP Bar. He is still reasonably junior and has a great technical background in life sciences. He is really impressive.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • A definite star of the future, Michael is very hard-working, technically excellent and a pleasure to work with.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Michael Conway is an absolute pleasure to work alongside. He is very user-friendly and approachable. He has a really bright future ahead of him.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 2Thomas Moody-Stuart
    Band 2Thomas Moody-Stuart

    Thomas Moody-Stuart

    Thomas Moody-Stuart KC is a seasoned and calm courtroom advocate who is admired for his practicality, responsiveness and tactical strength. He handles trade mark and patent infringement claims, as well as misuse of confidential information disputes. He has experience in patent validity actions involving supplementary protection certificates, and a good knowledge of pharmaceuticals and other medical industries.

    • Thomas Moody-Stuart KC is a great storyteller and reader of the judge. If you need a good communicator, he is the one to bring in.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 2Tom Jones
    Band 2Tom Jones

    Tom Jones

    Tom Jones is an impressive barrister, notable among other things for his involvement in high-profile FRAND litigation. Sources remark that he is quick to master important issues in his cases. His practice covers both patent and trade mark actions, and he represents clients in industries including TMT and life sciences.

    • Tom Jones is very strong. He is quick and adaptable; he has a bright future.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He is an extremely bright, commercially focused and user-friendly junior. A definite star of the future.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • We are using Tom Jones a lot. He is an expert in FRAND and SEP work.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3Ashton Chantrielle
    Band 3Ashton Chantrielle

    Ashton Chantrielle

    Ashton Chantrielle is a talented barrister who has developed a strong practice focusing on copyright and trade mark cases, representing clients in a diverse set of industries including media, fashion and pharmaceuticals. Her experience extends to trade secret litigation.

    • Ashton is extremely clever and is comfortable working with a silk or on her own. She is very calm and a safe pair of hands.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • She is really bright, personable and great with clients. She knows her stuff.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Ashton Chantrielle is friendly but incredibly forceful and very exacting in court. She is very precise in drafting pleadings; she has very solid foundations.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3Beth Collett
    Band 3Beth Collett

    Beth Collett

    Beth Collett is a skilled barrister with a growing profile for her trade mark, copyright and design rights practice. She additionally possesses experience in significant patent cases.

    • She worked incredibly effectively as part of our team. She was always available. She was never flustered and pulled up her sleeves when dealing with whatever came her way. I really rate her.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Beth Collett is an excellent trade mark barrister with litigation and Registry experience.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Beth is a go-to junior and a real standout. She is extremely clever and hard-working, and her written work is excellent. She throws herself into a solicitors' team and gets stuck in.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3James St Ville
    Band 3James St Ville

    James St Ville

    James St Ville KC is a highly experienced barrister who is well regarded for his attention to detail and commerciality. Sources appreciate the thoughtful and cautious approach he brings to trials. His experience includes the handling of copyright, patent and trade mark infringement disputes. His other areas of ability include database rights and design rights litigation. He is a good choice for IPEC, Patents Court and appellate proceedings.

    • James St Ville is a fantastic barrister.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • His analysis is really good, and he is a really good leader to work with.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • James is forensic in his approach. He is all over the finer details of the case.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3Jonathan Hill
    Band 3Jonathan Hill

    Jonathan Hill

    Jonathan Hill impresses instructing solicitors with his intelligence, user-friendliness and accomplished courtroom advocacy. He has notable experience of patent litigation relating to licensing agreements and infringement allegations. His additional areas of expertise include trade mark, copyright and database rights, as well as litigation concerning the misuse of confidential information. Industry sectors in which he is active include medical technology, media and retail.

    • Jonathan is technically excellent for IT and tech matters. He is very thorough and charming, and his advocacy is excellent. I give him all my big matters.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Jonathan Hill demonstrated excellent drafting and got to grips with the matter quickly.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He is a passionate advocate and very detail-oriented in technical cases. He is always able and willing to discuss strategy. He is always quick to respond and also works well with the end client.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3Mark Chacksfield
    Band 3Mark Chacksfield

    Mark Chacksfield

    Mark Chacksfield KC is highlighted for his recent activity in important patent cases before the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, and for his expertise in the FRAND space.

    • Mark Chacksfield KC is an excellent advocate, strategist and lateral thinker. He is a superb patent counsel.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Mark is an excellent silk who is very hands-on and is always across the important details of a case. He is very easy to work with and becomes an integral part of the team.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Mark is incredibly positive and enthusiastic. He is very calm under pressure and incredibly responsive. He is a pleasure to work with.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3Martin Howe
    Band 3Martin Howe

    Martin Howe

    Martin Howe KC is a user-friendly and cerebral advocate recognised for his abilities in high-profile copyright litigation. He is also adept at acting in passing-off disputes and claims relating to trade mark infringement, and has additional experience acting in patent disputes arising in the life sciences sector.

    • Martin is very eminent and yet very user-friendly. He doesn't mind being called.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Martin is pragmatic and has a very commercial approach. He is very strong in copyright.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • He is extremely bright and very strong on strategy.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 3William Duncan
    Band 3William Duncan

    William Duncan

    William Duncan is an able and experienced barrister who elicits praise from instructing solicitors for his work ethic and the quality of his written submissions and advice. He is adept at handling patent litigation in both the telecommunications and life sciences sectors, and commentators remark upon his burgeoning practice in the area of biotechnology in particular. He has also garnered considerable recognition for his FRAND practice.

    • William is a barrister who can quickly identify the core of complex material and build clear, well-reasoned arguments. He has the ability to bring structure and clarity to challenging cases.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • William is good to work with. He is an independent thinker.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • Band 4Iona Berkeley
    Band 4Iona Berkeley

    Iona Berkeley

    Iona Berkeley is known for her deep expertise in soft IP matters; her experience encompasses trade mark revocation actions, passing-off allegations and litigation relating to the parallel import of goods, as well as cases concerning the design of pharmaceutical products. She has also acted in a number of copyright actions on the televising of football.

    • Iona worked on a complex trade mark matter for us recently. She was excellent. She was very clear in her advice and thorough in reviewing evidence.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Iona Berkeley is excellent on law and strategy.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • A pleasure to work with, Iona inspires confidence on every level and is a very effective advocate in both written and oral submissions.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
  • New SilksJessie Bowhill
    New SilksJessie Bowhill

    Jessie Bowhill

    Jessie Bowhill is a highly regarded barrister who is known for her representation of clients in the broadcasting and music industries. She frequently appears in cases concerning copyright, trade mark and design right infringement.

    • Jessie Bowhill is technically brilliant and a very persuasive advocate who fights her client's corner in the most compelling way.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • Jessie Bowhill is extremely good. She is very no-nonsense and quick.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar
    • She is fantastic. She is really great with clients and gets into the detail. She is a fantastic advocate as well.

      Intellectual Property respondentUK Bar

Ranked Barristers at 8 New Square (24)

London (Bar)

What success is built on

Chambers is the leading data and intelligence partner for the legal sector.

Explore thought leadership