Experience
Tim Eckstein has developed a strong reputation in Phoenix and throughout Arizona as a criminal defense attorney and civil litigator. He has extensive experience representing clients against fraud charges and in internal investigations, particularly in health care, finance, education, and government. In 2019, Tim was named “Phoenix Lawyer of the Year” in Criminal Defense and White Collar Law by Best Lawyers®. Some of his trial cases have influenced statewide precedent, including a 2017 case that held that trial judges may weigh evidence, set aside a guilty verdict, and grant a new trial even if there is substantial evidence supporting the verdict. In another landmark case, he helped protect a defendant’s ability to present a grand jury with exculpatory evidence.
Within his practice, Tim focuses on investigations and criminal defense, appeals, and civil litigation. His broad-ranging investigation and criminal defense experience include white-collar and fraud prosecutions, and violent and other serious crimes. Tim has worked extensively on criminal appeals, special actions, and other post-conviction proceedings. He also devotes a substantial portion of his practice to civil litigation, representing businesses and individuals in a variety of commercial, contract, tort, and civil rights disputes.
Tim graduated from Harvard Law School and is an active member of a number of organizations related to criminal law, including Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice, Arizona Civil Liberties Union, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He is consistently recognized for his work in criminal defense by Best Lawyers® and has been named among “Arizona’s Finest Lawyers”. Tim is ranked in Chambers USA’s Litigation on White-Collar Crime and Government Investigations section.
Work Highlights
Representative Matters:
State v. Fischer, 242 Ariz. 44, 392 P.3d 488 (Ariz., 2017)
(holding that trial judge may weigh evidence, set aside a guilty verdict, and grant a new trial even if there is substantial evidence supporting the verdict)
Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n v. Brain, 234 Ariz. 322, 322 P.3d 139, 683 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 43 (Ariz., 2014)
(holding that legislation modifying contribution limits does not violate state constitutional requirements for modifying voter initiatives)
State v. Bigger, 227 Ariz. 196, 254 P.3d 1142 (2011)
(challenging admission of calculations of DNA-related testing and exclusion of third-party culpability evidence)
Bashir v. Pineda, 226 Ariz. 351, 248 P.3d 199 (2011)
(affirming prosecutor’s duty to provide relevant information to grand jury)
State v. Botkin, 221 Ariz. 1, 209 P.3d 137 (2009)
(statutory interpretation overturning court of appeals decision that would have required prison term)
Koch v. Lewis, 216 F.Supp.2d 994 (D. Ariz. 2001) (due process and indefinite, solitary confinement), vacated as moot upon client’s release from custody, 399 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2005)
Fraud:
Representation of corporate executive in election-fraud investigation
Representation of individual accused of filing false and forged financial documents as part of loan applications
Representation of billing manager in educational institution alleged to have defrauded the veteran’s administration
Representation of public school superintendent in investigation concerning misappropriation of public funds
Representation of former managing partner of large national accounting firm in charges of fraud and embezzlement
Representation of former executive director of quasi-public agency regarding allegations of internal fraud and theft
Representation of loan officer charged in multi-million dollar mortgage fraud scheme
Representation of private charitable organization in large tax and securities fraud investigation
Representation of not-for-profit affiliate of national travel-related organization in affirmative fraud action against private contractor
Representation of a gaming technology company in a grand jury investigation concerning use of machines and other technology
Representation of attorney who was subject of an investigation into fraud and elder abuse
Representation of individual in multi-million dollar federal loan fraud investigation
Representation of loan modification business in a wide-ranging consumer fraud action
Representation of three individuals accused of running an international gambling enterprise
Representation of three individual investors in state securities fraud investigation
Health Care Fraud:
Representation physicians alleged to have violated stark law and anti-kickback statute
Representation of employee of manufacturer and distributor of mislabeled and misbranded health care products
Representation of physicians in practice alleged to have engaged in medicare fraud
Representation of accountant-employee of health care centers alleged to have engaged in Medicare fraud
Representation of dentist charged with billing fraud against a large, private insurer
Representation of physician-subject of an investigation into prescription of anti-aging medical regimes
Representation of dentist charged with fraudulent billing against a self-insured quasi-public entity
Selected Internal Investigations:
Representation at trial of professional basketball player wrongfully accused in aggravated assault
Representation of professional wrestler wrongfully accused of sexual assault
Representation of professional sports organization in an investigation concerning employee sexual misconduct
Representation of national communications company concerning misuse of equipment to broadcast illicit material
Representation of publicly-traded aerospace company in investigation responding to implementation of government contract
Representation of residential developer subsidiary of a publicly-traded company in investigation of bribery of public officials
Representation of international chemical and manufacturing company into allegations of internal fraud by a former employee
Miscellaneous:
Representation of chief legal officer of herbal and medical product manufacturer and distributor
Representation of individual employees of internet-based publisher in grand jury investigation of alleged conspiracy with third-party users