Publications
·Interpretation of Ten Key Provisions of “Implementing Regulation for the Consumer Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, China Market Regulation News, May 15, 22, 29, 2024.
·Highlights and Compliance Tips of “Interim Provisions for Anti-Unfair Competition on Internet”, Wolters Kluwer, May 17, 2024.《
·China Advertising Law Enforcement Report (2023), Apr. 26, 2024.
·China Anti-Commercial Bribery Law Enforcement Report (2023), Mar. 29, 2024.
·An Exploration of Livestreaming Compliance, Co-authored with the experts from law enforcement agencies, China Industry and Commerce Press,Jan.1,2024.
·China Cosmetic Industry Advertising Law Enforcement Report (2022), Jun. 6, 2023.
·National Quality Inspection and Testing Center et al., Cosmetics Advertising Compliance Reference Book, China Industry and Commerce Press, April 2023.
·Legal Obligations of Platform Operators in Providing Internet Information Services for Advertising Activities on the Platform, Biweekly of Administration for Market Regulation(8th,2023).
·Eight Revision Points and Compliance Tips of “Administrative Measures for Internet Advertising," Wolters Kluwer, Mar. 24, 2023.
·China Anti-Commercial Bribery Law Enforcement Report (2018-2022), Wolters Kluwer, Mar. 17, 2023.
·Key Points in “Anti-Unfair Competition Law (draft amendment for comments)," Wolters Kluwer, Nov. 24, 2022.
·Discussion on the Regulation of Advertising by livestreamers in Live E-commerce, China Market Regulation News, Aug. 10, 2022.
·China Cosmetic Industry Advertising Law Enforcement Report (2021), Wolters Kluwer, May 25, 2022.
·China Anti-Commercial Bribery Law Enforcement Report (2021), Wolters Kluwer, Mar. 15, 2022.
·Case Analysis – Shall an Employee’s Product Promotions on WeChat Moments be Considered as Advertisements? The Administrative and Judicial Identification of “Private Domain” Advertising, China Market Regulation News, Jan. 19, 2022.
·China Cosmetic Industry Advertising Law Enforcement Report (2020), Wolters Kluwer, Jul. 20, 2021.
·China Anti-Commercial Bribery Law Enforcement Report (2020), Wolters Kluwer, May 12, 2021.
·The Market Regulation Perspective on Ten Highlights of the New Administrative Penalty Law, China Market Regulation News, Mar. 3, 2021.
·China Anti-Commercial Bribery Law Enforcement Report (2018-2019) (bilingual), Wolters Kluwer, Oct. 14, 2020.
·Analysis and Suggestions on the Regulation of Marketing Activities in Live E-commerce, China Market Regulation News September 24, 2020.
·Analysis of the Definition of “Influence” in Commercial Bribery, China Market Regulation News, May 28, 2019.
·Notes for Promotions of Drugs and Medical Devices – Starting from the Illegal Advertisement Case of Stryker Beijing, Wolters Kluwer, Mar. 13, 2019.
·Comments on GuaZi's “Far Ahead” Illegal Advertisement Case, Wolters Kluwer, Dec. 2, 2018.
·Can We Still Enjoy Dinner? – Starting from a penalty for a ¥604.80 Meal, Wolters Kluwer, Nov. 16, 2018.
·Summary and Compliance Tips of Difficult Issues of the Advertising Law Enforcement, published under the title “Standardizing Enforcement and Unifying Standards," China Industry and Commerce News, Mar. 6, 2018.
·Analysis of Commercial Bribery Risks in Free of Charge Equipment Placement under the New Anti-Unfair Competition Law, China Industry and Commerce News, Mar. 22, 2018.
·Key Points of the New Anti-Unfair Competition Law, Wolters Kluwer, Nov. 5, 2017.
·Analysis of the Commercial Bribery Clause in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (Draft), China Industry and Commerce News, May 17, 2017.
·The International Comity Doctrine in the Extraterritorial Effect of the U.S. Antitrust Law, Shanghai Competition Law Society Paper Collection 2016, Nov. 12, 2016.
·Front-burner Issues of Advertising Law Revision and Corporate Compliance, Wolters Kluwer, Oct. 19, 2015.
·Compliance Analysis of Free of Charge Equipment Placement with Respect to Commercial Bribery, Biweekly of Administration for Market Regulation (13th. 2015).
·Administrative Litigation Case Compilation regarding Administrative for Industrial and Commercial Penalties, China Industry and Commerce Press (1st ed. 2014).
Work Highlights
Attorney ZHANG has made it his specialty to offer assistance to multinational corporations operating in mainland of China with compliance difficulties, the prevention of criminal offenses, and criminal defence. With in-depth understanding of legal trends and industry competition, he is able to fully integrate law enforcement practices and corporate business purposes to provide clients with solutions that maximize their interests.
For example, he once represented a well-known Japanese clothing company in dealing with a case of commercial bribery involving employees in its Chinese procurement department. Attorney ZHANG efficiently assisted the Client in conducting an internal investigation and reporting to the public security and economic investigation bureau, ultimately forcing the employee to return to China and surrender, successfully helping the Client recover more than CNY 9 million in losses.(please keep this part of information confidential)
Moreover, attorney ZHANG also has strong capabilities in responding to government investigations. During his 5-year tenure at the Shanghai Administration of Industry and Commerce, he participated in coordinating work for joint investigations by the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of the People’s Republic of China (now Supervisory commission) and the Economic Crime Investigation Bureau under the Ministry of Public Security, reviewing hundreds of cases of anti-commercial bribery.
Therefore, attorney ZHANG is very familiar with the process of handling cases of anti-commercial bribery and can provide clients with professional and technical solutions from multiple perspectives.
Based on the needs of enterprise development, he has successfully handled a large number of government investigations involving advertising, anti-unfair competition, and anti-monopoly, and has provided compliance consulting services to many MNCs, including numerous Fortune 500 companies. For example, he represented a US pharmaceutical company in handling a government investigation. The Client was reported to the local discipline inspection commission and multiple market supervision bureaus for various signs of non-compliance. Attorney ZHANG worked closely with a US FCPA lawyer to conduct extensive analysis and judgment work. In the end, law enforcement agencies accepted attorney ZHANG’s opinion and gave up on filing a case against the Client.(please keep this part of information confidential)