Work Highlights
Supreme Court Cases include:
• Biogen v Medeva (Recombinant HCV, acting for Biogen)
• Conor v Angiotech (Taxol Eluting Stents, Acting for Angiotech)
• Synthon v GSK (Paroxetine, acting for GSK)
• Lundbeck v Mylan (Escitalopram, acting for Lundbeck)
• ICOS v Actavis (Tadalafil 5mg, Acting for ICOS)
• Actavis v Lilly (Pemetrexed, Acting for Lilly)
Other notable UK cases include:
• Semi-conductor devices (General Instrument v. Intel);
• Coding for compact discs (Optical Recording Corp. v. Hayden Labs);
• Flight simulators (Rediffusion Simulation v. Singer Link Miles);
• Contact lenses (Cibavision v Johnson & Johnson, Dublin);
• Copaxone (Generics/Mylan v Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd);
• Escitalopram (No.2) (Resolution Chemicals v H.Lundbeck);
• Antibodies to Amyloid-beta, for the treatment of Altzheimer’s Disease (Eli Lilly & Company v Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy);
• Cinacalcet for the treatment of bone disorders (Amgen v Accord);
• Anti-PD1 antibodies for the treatment of cancer (Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono);
• Copaxone (discolouration) (Synthon v Teva);
• Sofosbuvir for the treatment of HCV (Idenix v Gilead);
• Vedolzumab (Entyvio) antibodies for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis (Takeda v Roche);
• Adalimumab (Humira) for the treatment of RA inter alia (Samsung and Biiogen v AbbVie);
• Anti-IL23 antibodies for the treatment of psoriasis (Eli Lilly v Merck);
• Anti-IL17 antibodies for the treatment of psoriasis (Eli Lilly v Genentech);
• Anti-CGRP antibodies for the treatment of migraine (Eli Lilly v Teva);
• Slow release melatonin for insomnia (Neurim v Generics); Patch-worn
• Insulin pumps (Insulet v Roche);
• Arbitration (refaxamin - amorphous rifaximin) – Cipla v Salix;
• Factor IX inhibitor (Xaralto) (Teva and ors v Pfizer);
• Covid-19 mRNA vaccines (Moderna v Pfizer);
• Gene Therapy for type B haemophilia (Pfizer v UniQure);
• Eculizumab – complement inhibiting antibody (Alexion v Amgen).
A small selection of notable EPO cases includes:
• EP 2,996,521 – Acted for Doewe Egberts (Patentees) in resisting oppositions by Nestec, Belmoca, Caffitaly and ors before the OD
and the TBA.
• EP 1,623,350 - Acted for Genentech Inc (Proprietor) in T734/12 in respect of oppositions to EP in respect of “Therapy of
automimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response of a TNF-alpha inhibitor” (novelty of distinct patient population);
• EP1,213,919 - Acted for ROVI/United Video Properties (Proprietor) ‘’Interactive Television Guide System”;
• EP 748,213 - Nektar Inc - Opposition by Lillly - Subject matter: Inhalable insulin - acted for Patentee before Opposition Division.
• EPA 96915698.3 - Genentech Inc. - subject matter: use of IGF-1 to sustain biological response .
• EP 237,545 - Kirin-Amgen (Opponents: ICI, Kyowa Hakko, Boehringer Mannheim). Subject matter: recombinant granulocyte colony
stimulating factor (G-CSF).
• EP 702,555 - Pfizer Ltd. - (Opponents Lilly Corp, ICOS Corp and ors) - Subject matter: PDEV inhibitors for the treatment of impotence.
• EP 37,255 - Eli Lilly (Opponent - Hoechst) Subject matter: Process for the recombination of the A & B chains of insulin.
• EP 203,945 - Bonzel (Opponent: Advanced Cardiovascular Systems) Subject matter: Catheters for Percutaneous Transluminal
Coronary Angioplasty.
• EP 235,691 - Hoechst (Opponent - Eli Lilly) Mixing ball for insulin suspensions.
• EP 237,545 - Kirin-Amgen (Opponents: ICI, Kyowa Hakko, Boehringer Mannheim). Subject matter: recombinant granulocyte colony
stimulating factor (G-CSF).; EP 182,442 - Biogen, Inc. (Opponents: Murex, Institut Pasteur, Immuno, Hexal-Biotech). Subject matter:
recombinant hepatitis B viral antigens.
• EP 148,605 - Amgen, Inc. (Opponents: Elanex, Behringwerke, Boerhringer-Mannheim Immuno) Subject matter: recombinant
erythropoietin.
• EP 209,539 - Genetics Institute, Inc (Opponents: Cilag GmbH, Kirin-Amgen, Inc) subject matter: “Homogeneous Erythropoietin”.
• EP 375,724 – New York University (Opposition by Incyte Corp). Subject matter: Bacteriocidal Permeability Increasing proteins (BPI).