Email address
[email protected]Contact number
+48 22 557 76 40Share profile
Provided by Paweł Lewandowski
Paweł Lewandowski is the Co-Head of the Dispute Resolution Practice. He specialises in litigation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and corporate law, especially in the construction, energy, media, advertising and the financial services sectors. He has acted for clients in numerous proceedings before state and arbitral courts, especially before the Polish Supreme Court. He has also advised numerous clients in enforcement proceedings and proceedings to recognise and enforce foreign judgments and arbitral awards.
Paweł joined DZP in 1999.
Member of the Warsaw Bar Association of Attorneys-at-Law.
Paweł is an author of many legal opinions on various aspects of litigation. Selected publications include:
[Contractors vs. General Directorate for National Roads and Motorways – fight that doesn’t have to be lost], Rzeczpospolita, 5 March 2013
[Class action is not the best solution], Rzeczpospolita, 16 August 2012
[You have a deposit in a quasi bank? You can’t recover your money? What should you do?] Gazeta Wyborcza, 8 August 2012
Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration in Poland, SA KIG, 2011
Class Action, Warsaw Voice, 26 August 2010
Provided by Chambers
Paweł Lewandowski possesses broad experience in construction disputes, often advising clients within the finance, infrastructure and healthcare sectors.
Provided by Chambers
Paweł's explanations and coordination are very good, and he is a client-oriented partner.
He is a very experienced litigator with exceptional legal knowledge.
Paweł Lewandowski is a very strong performer and provides excellent service.
Paweł's explanations and coordination are very good, and he is a client-oriented partner.
He is a very experienced litigator with exceptional legal knowledge.
Paweł Lewandowski is a very strong performer and provides excellent service.
1 item provided by Domański Zakrzewski Palinka
Supreme Court win: compensation for incorrect implementation of EU directive on track access charges
We are representing one of the largest rail operators in a dispute over the payment of compensation by the State Treasury for incorrect implementation of an EU directive.
Supreme Court win: compensation for incorrect implementation of EU directive on track access charges
We are representing one of the largest rail operators in a dispute over the payment of compensation by the State Treasury for incorrect implementation of an EU directive.
