Jude Bunting KC

Jude Bunting KC is a superbly talented barrister acclaimed for his all-encompassing police law practice that includes civil claims, inquests and public inquiries, as well as judicial review. He has particular strength in data retention and protest-related matters and frequently handles cases concerning deaths occurring during police contact.

Jude Bunting KC is noted for his adroit representation of protesters in complex civil claims. He is frequently instructed in judicial review challenges against the police and public bodies concerning actions to prevent occupations and the restriction of protesters' access to events.

Jude Bunting KC runs a busy public law practice and is well respected for his knowledge of open justice and reporting restrictions. His experience includes appearances before the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

Jude Bunting KC is a highly rated barrister with an impressive track record of appearing in major human rights cases on behalf of a range of clients, including NGOs, the media and vulnerable individuals. He is frequently instructed before the Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights. He is highly sought after for his expertise in areas including police, prison and surveillance law, as well as discrimination, and in open justice challenges.

Jude Bunting KC has an excellent track record of successfully challenging policy and decisions of public bodies. His expertise encompasses human rights, equality and discrimination, policing and criminal law. Recent major challenges include Court of Appeal and Supreme Court cases arising from the Troubles in Northern Ireland.

Jude Bunting KC has wide-reaching experience which includes inquests arising from deaths in prison, deaths in police custody and proceedings arising from the Troubles in Northern Ireland. His deep expertise in public and administrative law means he is also well placed to advise on judicial reviews concerning coronial decisions.

Jude Bunting KC is highlighted for his experience in information law. He leverages his notable expertise in public law for data protection cases with a public element, such as judicial reviews.