Chambers Review
Provided by Chambers
UK-Bar
Immigration - London (Bar)
Individual Editorial
Shu Shin Luh is an excellent public law barrister who comes highly recommended for judicial review challenges to the lawfulness of detaining asylum seekers. Her clients are charities and vulnerable migrants claiming asylum in the UK on the grounds of torture, trafficking and other human rights abuses. She has appeared in immigration cases across all judicial forums, up to and including the Supreme Court and the ECtHR.
Civil Liberties & Human Rights - London (Bar)
Individual Editorial
Shu Shin Luh is a highly admired barrister who has a phenomenal reputation in children’s rights and trafficking. She focuses her human rights practice on representing vulnerable persons, including the mentally ill and incapacitated. She appears in domestic and European courts for claimants and interveners, such as NGOs and charitable organisations.
Administrative & Public Law - London (Bar)
Individual Editorial
Shu Shin Luh pursues significant public law challenges on behalf of marginalised claimants and interveners. She is particularly committed to safeguarding the rights of children and migrants. Her substantive expertise includes immigration, human rights, social welfare and education. Sources commend her considerable expertise in the law on human trafficking.
Community Care - London (Bar)
Individual Editorial
Shu Shin Luh is an impressive barrister who frequently acts for vulnerable persons in individual claims and litigation challenging public policy. She draws praise from the market for the determination she brings to her brief. She is noted for her work on access to support for vulnerable young people who exhibit characteristics protected by the Equality Act 2010.
Education - London (Bar)
Individual Editorial
Shu Shin Luh is a highly regarded education and community care junior with a strong background in advising vulnerable clients and in counselling parents in relation to complex equality claims. She will often work with NGOs and is active in testing the limits of local authorities' education funding duties towards children and young adults under their care.