Ranking tables

Immigration | UK Bar

London (Bar)

Those ranked in this section have a practice focusing on immigration and asylum appeals in the tribunals and above. The section covers both applicant- and government-side instructions. Human rights-based and business immigration cases are equally relevant.

All Sets profiles

1

Band 1

  1. Doughty Street Chambers
    1
    Doughty Street Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 1 | 22 Years Ranked

    Doughty Street Chambers is a strong immigration set with significant expertise in judicial review proceedings challenging Home Office policy and decisions. The barristers are particularly well versed in asylum and deportation in the context of human rights law. An instructing solicitor notes that "every single one of the barristers is really exceptional". Members act for a large number of public access clients, as well as NGOs and private clients. These barristers have recently acted in cases emerging out of the Manston House asylum accommodation inquiry, as well as handling complex family reunion and asylum matters relating to Gazan refugees.

    The clerking team is headed by Sian Wilkins.

  2. Garden Court Chambers
    1
    Garden Court Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 1 | 22 Years Ranked

    Garden Court Chambers is a highly esteemed immigration set with a strong track record in sophisticated cases at the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and SIAC. Areas of particular strength include complex asylum and deportation matters in the context of European human rights law, but also private, business and high net worth immigration. A source remarks that "they are a very experienced set of barristers with a broad and very diverse range of expertise" and that they are "unrivalled" in terms of the strength of the bench. Barristers from the set act for a broad range of clients on the claimant side, including private individuals, children, families and sponsoring businesses. Recent highlights include representing asylum seekers in challenges to the Rwanda plan.

    Colin Cook is director of clerking.

2

Band 2

  1. 39 Essex Chambers
    2
    39 Essex Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 2 | 22 Years Ranked

    39 Essex Chambers, managed by director of clerking Sheraton Doyle, is an impressive immigration and public law set that has significant experience acting for both the government and claimants. A peer notes that the members deal with complex matters "fearlessly and with enormous skill". Members are frequently instructed in sensitive and high-profile litigation before the higher courts, including SIAC. Areas of complementary expertise include asylum, EU law, civil liberties and nationality law. Barristers from the set have acted in prominent recent cases including concerning challenges to the policy of seeking to remove some asylum seekers to Rwanda for the determination of their claims.

  2. Landmark Chambers
    2
    Landmark Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 2 | 13 Years Ranked

    Landmark Chambers offers deep expertise across a range of immigration matters, with a particularly strong bench at silk level. Areas of focus include deportation and unlawful detention matters, and immigration work involving EU law or the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement. The barristers appear in all the higher domestic courts and act both for claimants and for the Home Secretary. Landmark Chambers is host to a bench that has a "good barrister for any immigration issue", combined with "attention to detail". A notable recent highlight is the set's involvement, on behalf of the Home Secretary, in a challenge to consider the legality of the continued application of the good character requirement in connection with the Windrush scheme.

    Ben Connor and Mark Ball are practice directors.

  3. Matrix Chambers
    2
    Matrix Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 2 | 22 Years Ranked

    Matrix Chambers is a leading set with significant experience in immigration matters at all levels, from sensitive and high-profile national security SIAC proceedings to Supreme Court appeals on the Home Office's approach to victims of trafficking. Other areas of strength include unlawful detention claims and removals. The set has been described as "among the best at working on complex matters". The majority of the barristers' work in this area is for claimants. Recently, members led the representation of the claimants in AAA v SSHD, a judicial review claim concerning the Home Secretary's plan to remove failed asylum seekers to Rwanda.

    Alison Scanes is senior practice manager.

  4. One Pump Court
    2
    One Pump Court
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 2 | 19 Years Ranked

    One Pump Court is routinely called upon in a wide range of immigration matters, including deportation, asylum and nationality law, encompassing both human rights and public law challenges. The set has a strong focus on publicly funded claimant-side work, and members act for a diverse client roster including claimants with mental or physical health conditions and victims of trafficking. Recent work highlights include the representation of a Palestinian man in the complex review of entry clearance, hindered by the lack of visa facilities in the conflict zone. Interviewees describe the set as "expert counsel who have a significant impact and invaluable input" on matters, and one noted that their advocacy was "top drawer".

    Ian Burrow is senior clerk.

3

Band 3

  1. 1 Crown Office Row
    3
    1 Crown Office Row
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 3 | 3 Years Ranked

    Barristers at 1 Crown Office Row are notable for their appearances in immigration and asylum cases before the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, and in SIAC hearings. They continue to act in prominent cases including AAA and Others v Home Secretary - the Rwanda removals policy challenge - and Begum v Home Secretary. An instructing solicitor notes that "this set is distinguished by its specialist expertise, innovative legal strategies and dedication to achieving the best outcomes". The barristers at 1 Crown Office Row are deeply experienced in appeals involving an element of alleged criminality or national security concern.

  2. Blackstone Chambers
    3
    Blackstone Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 3 | 22 Years Ranked

    Blackstone Chambers is a revered public law and human rights set with significant experience acting on behalf of claimants and the Home Secretary in complex immigration matters. Instructing solicitors note that members of the set are "consistently brilliant" and that "you always know that you will be in good hands". Areas of strength include complex asylum claims, unlawful detention and issues involving EU law. Its recent notable work includes a challenge to the UK government's refugee pushback policy, as well as appearing in the Supreme Court in Shamima Begum v Special Immigration Appeals Commission.

    Derek Sutton and Adam Sloane are joint senior clerks.

4

Band 4

  1. Goldsmith Chambers
    4
    Goldsmith Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 4 | 4 Years Ranked

    Goldsmith Chambers offers a wealth of expertise in all areas of immigration and asylum, at all levels of the court and tribunal system, including the Supreme Court, facilitated by clerks Neil Dinsdale and Will Heavey. Instructing solicitors notes that members of the set are "able to navigate the changes in the area of law to secure the best results for the client". Notable recent highlights in the set's work include various judicial reviews and precedent-setting matters such as GH v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

    The immigration senior clerk is Neil Dinsdale.

  2. No5 Barristers' Chambers
    4
    No5 Barristers' Chambers
    Immigration
    2026 | Band 4 | 4 Years Ranked

    No5 Barristers' Chambers members regularly act in immigration and asylum matters at all levels of the court and tribunal system, and some have appeared before the ECJ and the ECtHR. Facilitated by the clerking team, led by Tony McDaid, they have a strong record of success in difficult challenges to deportation orders and asylum refusals, and possess significant expertise in relation to high-risk destinations for returnees. Solicitors describe the set as "providing high-calibre expertise across all areas of immigration, asylum and nationality law". Their key instructions include an appeal in the Supreme Court concerning deportation in an instance where the appellant had committed a crime but sought to resist deportation on the basis of undue harshness towards family members.