Band 4
Provided by Mohan Gopalan
Mohan specialises in insolvency and debt restructuring and regularly advises creditors, debtors and insolvency office-holders on transactional and litigation aspects of insolvency and debt restructuring matters.
LL.B (Hons) National University of Singapore; LL.M. (Banking and Finance Law), London; Admitted to the Singapore Bar
Member, Insolvency Practice Committee, Law Society of Singapore
“The Restructuring of Berlian Laju Tanker” (2016) 1 INSOL World 20; “Creditor Schemes of Arrangement and Dissenting Creditor Protection” (2018) 30 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 902; “Two things lenders should know about schemes of arrangement in Singapore” (2018) Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 511; “The Moratorium under Sections 210(10) and 211B of the Companies Act” [2019] SAL Practitioner 2
Provided by Chambers
Provided by Chambers
He's well liked and very clever when it comes to restructuring/insolvency matters.
Mohan Gopalan consistently provides excellent services in helping clients navigate successfully through complex restructuring matters.
He's well liked and very clever when it comes to restructuring/insolvency matters.
Mohan Gopalan consistently provides excellent services in helping clients navigate successfully through complex restructuring matters.
1 item provided by Drew & Napier LLC
UK Court approved a restructuring plan despite shareholders retaining majority shares under the plan
The English High Court in Re Sino-Ocean Group Holding Ltd approved a restructuring plan despite it allowing the shareholders to retain a majority shareholding in the company and thus disproportionally benefiting the shareholders. Among the reasons for its decision, the court noted the economic benef
UK Court approved a restructuring plan despite shareholders retaining majority shares under the plan
The English High Court in Re Sino-Ocean Group Holding Ltd approved a restructuring plan despite it allowing the shareholders to retain a majority shareholding in the company and thus disproportionally benefiting the shareholders. Among the reasons for its decision, the court noted the economic benef