Chambers Review
Provided by Chambers
USA
Litigation: General Commercial - Texas: Austin & Surrounds
Individual Editorial
Marc Collier is highly regarded for his experience acting on behalf of clients in federal and state courts.
Band 1
Provided by Marc Collier
Marc Collier is a trial lawyer with specific expertise in complex IP, life sciences, financial and accounting issues, and commercial disputes.
He joined the Austin office of Norton Rose Fulbright in 1997 and is currently Head of Disputes and Litigation for that office. As a partner, Marc’s practice is largely comprised of large-scale corporate litigation matters across multiple industries. He has been first chair and tried cases throughout the nation to juries, the court, as well as before and involving administrative agencies including the ITC, FDA, and the FTC. Marc has successfully defended as well as secured multi-million dollar verdicts and judgments for his clients including major hospital systems, pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, semiconductor manufacturers, streaming music providers, in addition to multiple multinational software, hardware, and service companies. He has been counsel for defendants in MDL and class action law suits involving complex global matters in a variety of areas including contractual, intellectual property, and antitrust.
Judicial Clerk, The Honorable Paul Brown, United States District Court, Eastern District, Texas, 1995-1997; Editor-in-Chief, Baylor Law Review; JD, magna cum laude, Baylor University Law School, 1995; MA Taxation, Baylor University 1995; United States Air Force, 1988-1992; BBA, summa cum laude, ENMU, 1992
Provided by Chambers
Marc Collier is highly regarded for his experience acting on behalf of clients in federal and state courts.
Provided by Chambers
"We bring Marc into cases because of his wealth of knowledge. He has an amazing ability to simplify very difficult concepts in a way that a lay jury or lay judges can understand. He is very practical and pragmatic."
"We bring Marc into cases because of his wealth of knowledge. He has an amazing ability to simplify very difficult concepts in a way that a lay jury or lay judges can understand. He is very practical and pragmatic."