Work Highlights
Representative Cases of retrial by the Supreme Court
- On behalf of the Shuinan Street Office in Xinzhou District, Shangrao City, we applied for a retrial of the enterprise loan dispute case to the Supreme People’s Court and successfully obtained the Supreme People’s Court’s review.
- On behalf of Ping An Bank Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch, we have applied for retrial to the Supreme People’s Court regarding the financial loan contract dispute with Greenland Energy Group Co., Ltd. and have successfully been brought to trial by the Supreme People’s Court.
- On behalf of Khorgos Wanxin Venture Capital Co., Ltd. (formerly Jiangsu Wanxin Holding Group Co., Ltd.), he applied to the Supreme People’s Court for retrial of the case concerning the dispute over the financial loan contract with China Orient Asset Management Co., Ltd. Jiangsu Branch, and was successfully brought up for trial by the Supreme People’s Court.
- On behalf of China Postal Savings Bank Co., Ltd. Wuwei Wenchang Road Branch, we have applied for retrial to the Supreme People’s Court regarding a series of contract disputes with Jilin Jiaohe Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd., and have successfully been brought to trial by the Supreme People’s Court.
- In a case where the execution basis of the applicant for execution was revoked and remanded for retrial, when the applicant for execution encountered the court’s execution reversal procedure, he Represented the applicant for execution to apply for execution supervision to the Supreme People’s Court, and ultimately obtained the result of the Supreme People’s Court revoking the lower court’s execution ruling and stopping the execution reversal procedure.
Securities and Financial Litigation Representative Cases
- In a dispute arising from the policyholder defrauding the insurance company with hundreds of tons of fake precious metal products, the insurance company Represented dozens of parties in filing insurance contract lawsuits against the insurance company, with a total amount of billions of yuan.
- In the first national ABS asset-backed securities fraud issuance case heard by the Shanghai Financial Court, Representing the plaintiff China Postal Savings Bank Co., Ltd., a lawsuit was filed against securities service agencies including securities companies, law firms, and credit rating agencies for securities fraud issuance. This successfully led to the Shanghai Financial Court ruling that the financial advisor of the plan shall bear 100% joint and several liability, and the special plan manager, rating agency, and legal advisor shall bear 30%, 10%, and 10% joint and several liability, respectively.
- In a dispute over shareholder liability for damages to creditors caused by the entrusted holding of equity by a trust company, one of the Representative shareholders responded to the creditor’s claim. The case went through a retrial by two levels of courts in Beijing and the Supreme People’s Court, and was ultimately fully won.
- Due to Shanxi Haixin Group’s failure to pick up goods without a bill of lading, a certain bank’s letter of credit payment cannot be recovered. The bank has applied for the detention of foreign ships in several domestic maritime courts on behalf of the bank, and has also filed a lawsuit against the carrier for damages caused by the release of goods without a bill of lading, with a total amount of 80 million US dollars.
- Representing underwriting agency China Merchants Securities in responding to the false statement case of Liaoning Huachen Group bonds, all cases were won in the first instance and are currently in the second instance.
- Representing underwriting agency Wanlian Securities in the case of Liaoning Dandong Port Bond Statement, both the first and second trials were successful.
- Representing underwriting agency China Merchants Securities in response to the false statement case of Lova Group’s securities, all lawsuits were rejected in the first instance and are currently in the second instance.
The underwriting agency, Postal Savings Bank of China Limited, is currently in the first instance of handling a dispute over false statements in Shanghai Huaxin Group’s bonds.
- Representing underwriting agency Fangzheng Securities in response to the false statement case of Peking University Fangzheng Bonds, the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit after the first instance hearing.
- Dongxing Securities, Representing the continuous supervision organization, has won all the first instance cases and is currently in the second instance in response to the stock related false statement liability dispute caused by Zhongtian Energy’s illegal guarantee.
- On behalf of the underwriting institution, Open Source Securities responded to the securities false statement dispute case of Hongye Chemical Group, losing the first instance, winning all the second instances, and winning the retrial of the Supreme People’s Court.
The Representative underwriting institution Changjiang Securities has rejected all lawsuits in the first instance in response to the false statement dispute case of Jackie Chan Construction Group, which has become effective.
- The Representative underwriting institution Guotai Junan Securities has rejected all lawsuits in the first instance in response to the false statement dispute case of Beijing Huaye Capital, which has taken effect.
- Representing underwriting agency Zhongshan Securities in the dispute over false statements by Shandong Dongchen Group, the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit after the first instance hearing.
- Represented Daxin Certified Public Accountants in the retrial of the Wuyang Debt case to the Supreme People’s Court.
Representative Cases of Circular Trade and Bulk Commodity Trade Disputes
- On behalf of the defendant Sinopec Chemical Sales (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., an appeal was filed in the case of a sales contract dispute between Zhongyi Dongfang Economic and Trade Development Co., Ltd. and Sinopec Chemical Sales (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., successfully prompting the Shanghai High Court to revoke the original judgment and dismiss the plaintiff’s lawsuit in the second instance. Case No.: (2022) Hu Min Zhong 232
- On behalf of the defendant, Sinopec Chemical Sales Co., Ltd., an appeal was filed regarding the dispute over the sales contract with Chengdu Gaotou Materials Co., Ltd., successfully prompting the Shanghai High Court to revoke the original judgment and dismiss the plaintiff’s lawsuit in the second instance. Case No.: (2022) Hu Min Zhong 240
- In the case of the sales contract dispute between Jiangsu Shuntian Shipbuilding Development Co., Ltd. and Heilongjiang Beidahuang Grain and Oil Wholesale Market Co., Ltd., the third party Wuxi Hongtaiyuan Technology Co., Ltd., and the third party Jiangsu Yonglu Grain and Oil Co., Ltd., the Representative of Heilongjiang Beidahuang Grain and Oil Wholesale Market Co., Ltd. applied for retrial to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court ruled to bring the case to trial. Case No.: (2019) Su Minshen No. 225
- The case of contract dispute between Ganghe (Shanghai) Economic and Trade Co., Ltd. and China Mineral Resources Co., Ltd., as well as the third party Shandong Yaozhu New Materials Co., Ltd. and Shandong Yaoshuo Import and Export Trading Co., Ltd., was appealed on behalf of the defendant China Mineral Resources Co., Ltd. The Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court revoked the original judgment and rejected the plaintiff’s lawsuit. Case No.: (2018) Jing 01 Min Zhong 5775
- In the case of contract dispute between Liaoyuan Coal Coking Group Co., Ltd., Gujiao Wujinyuan Coal Coking Co., Ltd., Shanxi Xishan Coal and Electricity Co., Ltd., Xishan Coal and Electricity (Group) Co., Ltd., and Shanxi Coking Coal Group Co., Ltd., with a disputed amount exceeding 800 million yuan, the appellant Represented Liaoyuan Coal Coking Group Co., Ltd. and Gujiao Wujinyuan Coal and Coking Co., Ltd. in the second instance proceedings of the Supreme People’s Court, prompting the Supreme People’s Court to revoke the original judgment and remand for retrial. Case No.: (2018) Supreme Court Civil Final 908
- In two contract dispute cases involving several hundred million yuan in a certain four major banks, the Representative changed his profession to respond to the retrial procedure initiated by the opposing party in the Supreme People’s Court, successfully prompting the Supreme People’s Court to reject the opposing party’s retrial application. [Case Number: (2019) Supreme Court Civil Shen 1533] [Case Number: (2019) Supreme Court Civil Shen 2994]