Emily Soothill

Practice Areas

Emily helps individuals use the law to challenge decisions that violate their rights, seek accountability for unlawful treatment and claim compensation for harm that they have suffered. She has a diverse caseload which includes public law challenges and complex group claims.

After bringing a successful judicial review (NB and Others v SSHD, Claim No. CO/312/2021) challenging the legality of conditions at Napier Barracks and the Defendant’s system for allocating asylum seekers to barracks accommodation, Emily is currently representing asylum seekers accommodated in Napier Barracks in civil claims regarding the adequacy of their accommodation. Emily is also the lead solicitor on a group claim for damages on behalf of individuals detained unlawfully in the controversial Manston short-term holding facility.

Emily has particular expertise in international human rights litigation against corporate actors and complex group claims. She has worked on a number of corporate accountability cases, including a claim against African Barrick Gold (Acacia Mining) relating to injuries and deaths at the North Mara Mine in Tanzania and a compensation claim against Anglo American South Africa and AngloGold Ashanti, brought by former gold miners with the debilitating lung disease silicosis, leading to a ground-breaking settlement for 4,365 former miners.

Emily also has experience of bringing civil claims on behalf of victims of human trafficking and has delivered training to NGOs in this area. In 2016, Emily helped secure the first High Court judgment ever handed down against a British company for claims arising from modern slavery.

Career

Emily Soothill is a solicitor in our Bristol office who joined the firm in 2017. Emily is ranked as an “associate to watch” for civil liberties and human rights and has been described as "a certified genius. She works incredibly hard and is super bright, empathetic and thoughtful.” She has also been recognised as being “really effective, strategic and very forensic” and “someone who is very emotionally intelligent, and clients love her.”

Prior to joining DPG, Emily worked in the International and Group Claims department of Leigh Day and trained at Herbert Smith Freehills, where she worked in the firm’s London, Tokyo, and Hong Kong offices. She has also volunteered with Reprieve, representing indigent clients facing the death penalty in America, the International Organisation of Migration, assisting internally displaced persons following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, and the International Refugee Rights Initiative in Uganda.

Professional Memberships

Emily has an LLM in Public International Law and is a member of the Police Action Lawyers Group.

Experience

Significant cases on which Emily has worked include:

NB and Others v SSHD, Claim No. CO/312/2021: Judicial review successfully challenging the legality of conditions at Napier Barracks and the Defendant’s system for allocating asylum seekers to barracks accommodation.

R (Gabriel Clarke-Holland) v SSHD, Claim No. CO/1539/2023: Judicial review challenging government plans to set up an asylum accommodation centre at Weathersfield Airfield (ongoing).

R (Carralyn Parkes) v SSHD, Claim No. AC-2023-LON-002660: Judicial review claim challenging the Home Secretary’s use of the Bibby Stockholm barge to accommodate asylum-seekers at Portland Port in Dorset, without obtaining planning permission (ongoing).

EW v SSHD, Claim No. CO/4866/2020: Systemic challenge to the refusal of asylum support and accommodation to destitute failed asylum seekers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

R (MK) v Secretary of State for Home Department (High Court): Challenge to systemic delays in the determination of asylum claims by unaccompanied children.

Cushnie v Ministry of Justice, Claim No. A02CL457: Disability discrimination claim alleging failure to provide adequate medical treatment and make reasonable adjustments for disabled prisoner.

Galdikas and others v DJ Houghton Catching Services and others, Claim No. HQ14P05429: Landmark High Court case against British company on behalf of victims of modern slavery.

Kesabo and others v African Barrick Gold and North Mara Gold Mine, Claim No. HQ13X02118: Claim against African Barrick Gold (Acacia Mining) relating to injuries and deaths at the North Mara Mine in Tanzania which was identified by The Lawyer as one of the top 20 global disputes of 2015.

Qubeka and others v Anglo American South Africa Ltd and Anglo Gold Ashanti Ltd: South African arbitral proceedings in which thousands of South African gold miners successfully obtained compensation for silicosis against Anglo American and Anglo Gold.

OECD Complaint by the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy to the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.