Rankings
Leading firm in Asia-Pacific 2026
Ranked Individuals:
Contributions and articles
Provided by Singularity Legal
- Articles, Press releases, highlights
Overview
Provided by Singularity Legal
Singularity is an international disputes boutique with offices in India, UAE, and Singapore. Since 2017, we have handled over US$ 10 billion in high-end, complex, cross-border disputes. Singularity maintains its own advocacy capabilities and differentiates itself through its integrated approach, combining its disputes resolution expertise with asset tracing, investigation, and litigation finance to deliver end-to-end solutions for clients across emerging markets.
Work & experience
Provided by Singularity Legal
Singularity has been successful in a few landmark cases across jurisdictions. We highlight two below: 1. The first time wherein the DIFC Court of Appeal affirmed that a provisional award (granting interim reliefs) can be enforced as an award under DIFC’s arbitration law. This case was published by Global Arbitration Review. 2. The first time where a Russian judgement has been enforced by an Indian court. This case was published by Global Arbitration Review.
Ranked Offices
Provided by Singularity Legal
India - Head office
Maharashtra
1809-1810, One Lodha Place, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Paret , Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400013, Mumbai
Ranked Individuals
Articles, highlights and press releases
34 items provided by Singularity Legal
AI is New, Privilige is Not: Courts Begin Applying Old Doctrines to Generative AI
In this Alert, we examine how courts in the US and UK are applying traditional doctrines of privilege, confidentiality and work product protection to generative AI. The emerging position is clear: AI is new, but the legal tests are not.
Ship Arrest and Mareva Injunctions: Cumulative Remedies in Shipping Disputes and the Emerging Indian
In this Alert, we examine the evolving Indian admiralty law position on the simultaneous use of ship arrest and Mareva injunctions as cumulative remedies to secure maritime claims and strengthen enforcement strategies in cross-border shipping disputes.
Applicability of Transnational Issue Estoppel in Arbitral Award Enforcement Proceedings in India
This article examines the Supreme Court’s recognition of transnational issue estoppel in foreign award enforcement proceedings in India, while also analysing the doctrine’s treatment in other common law jurisdictions and the unresolved questions left open by the Court.
The Curious Case of Dissolved Foreign Companies in Cross-Border Insolvency: Comparative Perspectives
In its decision in AICO v Al Aggad, the BVI High Court confirmed that a liquidator may be appointed over a dissolved foreign company to investigate and recover assets situated within its jurisdiction.
Singularity Legal Shortlisted at FT Innovative Lawyers Asia-Pacific 2026
Singularity Legal is pleased to announce that it has been shortlisted at the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers Asia-Pacific 2026 Awards under the category “Innovative Lawyers in Disputes & Crisis Management – Offshore Litigation.”
Credit Suisse AT-1 Instruments: The HDFC Bank Controversy
This insight examines the potential claims that the investors may level against HDFC, and the potential defences that HDFC may raise against these claims.
Clarity Restored On The DIFC Conduit Jurisdiction
In this Alert, we analyse Timothy Hugh Christian Taylor v Arlette Joelle Marie Madeleine Yao Affi, a recent decision of the DIFC Court of First Instance which reaffirms the contours of conduit jurisdiction in the DIFC.
Beyond the New York Convention: India’s Quiet Routes to Enforcing Foreign Awards
This Insight, examines how foreign arbitral awards from non-reciprocating countries under Section 44(b) of the Arbitration Act can be enforced in India. It highlights two alternative routes—filing a fresh suit under common law principles and relying on applicable bilateral treaty frameworks.
Reasserting Contractual Discipline Under FIDIC: Variations, Procedure, and the Limits of Informality
In this Alert, we trace the UK Privy Council's reasoning in highlighting the risks of informal project conduct and underscoring the need for disciplined, contract-driven administration to safeguard entitlements under FIDIC regimes.
How Should Cryptocurrency Losses be Valued? Singapore High Court Ties Damages to Mitigation
In a recent decision, the Singapore High Court clarified that cryptocurrency damages are to be valued based on when a claimant could reasonably mitigate losses—not at breach or trial—tying valuation firmly to mitigation principles.
THE LAST 365 DAYS IN THE DIFC COURTS
This paper serves as a one-stop consolidation of the year’s key developments across the DIFC judicial landscape. It brings together the insights explored in our earlier papers while extending the discussion to the Courts’ new laws & institutional reforms, jurisprudential developments......
The Evolving Landscape of Freestanding Injunctions in the DIFC
This paper explores the pivotal developments that have framed the DIFC Courts’ injunctive landscape over the past year.
Untangling Conflict of Jurisdiction between DIFC and Onshore Courts
This paper traces how Dubai’s dual-court system progression toward judicial comity and coordination over the past year. A key step in transforming the jurisdictional conflict mechanism was the replacement of the Joint Judicial Committee with the Conflict of Jurisdictions Tribunal.
The Act of State Doctrine and the DIFC’s Turn Toward Transnational Common Law
As part of Singularity’s experttalk initiative, we are pleased to present an Insight into THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE AND THE DIFC’S TURN TOWARD TRANSNATIONAL COMMON LAW. This continues our five-part series on the litigation framework in the DIFC over the last 365 days, in the run up to the DAW 2025.
JAL 2.0: The DIFC Courts Reboot
This paper is the first of a five-part series on the litigation framework in the DIFC over the last 365 days, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2025. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion on The Litigation Framework in the DIFC- The Last 365 Days on 10 November 2025.
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 & 37 of the Arbitration Act
In this alert, we analyse the Apex Court’s significant decision addressing the extent to which Indian courts may intervene in arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”).
Singularity Elevates Middle East Presence
Singularity Legal is pleased to announce the relocation of Natasha Kavalakkat, Managing Counsel, to its Dubai office as part of the firm’s strategic expansion in the Middle East.
A bankruptcy petition cannot be presented on the basis of an unrecognised foreign judgement
In this Alert, we have analyzed the recent decision of the UK Court of Appeal’s in "Servis-Terminal LLC v. Valeriy Ernestovich Drelle" , which clarifies that a bankruptcy petition cannot be based on an unrecognised foreign judgment.
Examining the Nuances of Contrasting Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Within the Same Agreement
This case interprets and construes seemingly two arbitration clauses within the same agreement, one providing a mandatory route and the other providing a permissive route. It highlights the importance of ensuring that dispute resolution clauses are drafted carefully.
Key Amendments In The Source And Interpretation Of DIFC Laws
The DIFC amended its Application Law to clarify the use of “DIFC Law,” now defined as statutory provisions and court decisions. Courts can reference common law, including English and other jurisdictions, and international model laws for interpretation.
Lexology recognizes Prateek Bagaria for his Arbitration & Commercial Litigation practise
We are proud to share that our Partner, Prateek Bagaria has been recognized as a Future Leader in Arbitration and recommended for his Commercial Litigation practice by Lexology Index in it’s ‘Commercial Litigation-Future Leaders-Partners’ index ranking for 2024.
DAW 2024: Litigation framework in the DIFC and its implications for global enforcement and recovery
Singularity is hosting a comprehensive 90 minute panel discussion on litigation framework in the DIFC and its implications for global enforcement and recovery strategies on 11 November, 2024 the opening day of the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024.
Enforcing against sovereigns in the DIFC : Navigating Immunity and Sanctions
This paper is the fourth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-a
Enforcement of Russian judgments under the Lugovoy Law in the DIFC
This paper is the sixth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-an
Remedies available in local courts on enforcement orders and judgements of the DIFC courts
This paper is the fifth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-an
Obtaining worldwide freezing orders in the DIFC: Freestanding and in aid of enforcement
This paper is the fourth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-a
Enforcing interim measures in the DIFC
This paper is the third of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-an
DIFC Courts as a conduit for enforcement within and outside the UAE
This paper is the second of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-a
Remedies for non-compliance with non-money judgments: A Closer Look at Committal and Sequestration
This paper is the first of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion on the litigation framework in the DIFC and its implications for global enforcement and re
Demystifying the digital asset dispute resolution landscape
The webinar will explore best practices and solutions for resolving issues related to digital assets including cryptocurrencies, NFTs, DeFi, metaverse, and stablecoins. This discussion will involve an insightful overview of the latest issues, trends and jurisprudence relating to the these assets.
AI is New, Privilige is Not: Courts Begin Applying Old Doctrines to Generative AI
In this Alert, we examine how courts in the US and UK are applying traditional doctrines of privilege, confidentiality and work product protection to generative AI. The emerging position is clear: AI is new, but the legal tests are not.
Ship Arrest and Mareva Injunctions: Cumulative Remedies in Shipping Disputes and the Emerging Indian
In this Alert, we examine the evolving Indian admiralty law position on the simultaneous use of ship arrest and Mareva injunctions as cumulative remedies to secure maritime claims and strengthen enforcement strategies in cross-border shipping disputes.
Applicability of Transnational Issue Estoppel in Arbitral Award Enforcement Proceedings in India
This article examines the Supreme Court’s recognition of transnational issue estoppel in foreign award enforcement proceedings in India, while also analysing the doctrine’s treatment in other common law jurisdictions and the unresolved questions left open by the Court.
The Curious Case of Dissolved Foreign Companies in Cross-Border Insolvency: Comparative Perspectives
In its decision in AICO v Al Aggad, the BVI High Court confirmed that a liquidator may be appointed over a dissolved foreign company to investigate and recover assets situated within its jurisdiction.
Singularity Legal Shortlisted at FT Innovative Lawyers Asia-Pacific 2026
Singularity Legal is pleased to announce that it has been shortlisted at the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers Asia-Pacific 2026 Awards under the category “Innovative Lawyers in Disputes & Crisis Management – Offshore Litigation.”
Credit Suisse AT-1 Instruments: The HDFC Bank Controversy
This insight examines the potential claims that the investors may level against HDFC, and the potential defences that HDFC may raise against these claims.
Clarity Restored On The DIFC Conduit Jurisdiction
In this Alert, we analyse Timothy Hugh Christian Taylor v Arlette Joelle Marie Madeleine Yao Affi, a recent decision of the DIFC Court of First Instance which reaffirms the contours of conduit jurisdiction in the DIFC.
Beyond the New York Convention: India’s Quiet Routes to Enforcing Foreign Awards
This Insight, examines how foreign arbitral awards from non-reciprocating countries under Section 44(b) of the Arbitration Act can be enforced in India. It highlights two alternative routes—filing a fresh suit under common law principles and relying on applicable bilateral treaty frameworks.
Reasserting Contractual Discipline Under FIDIC: Variations, Procedure, and the Limits of Informality
In this Alert, we trace the UK Privy Council's reasoning in highlighting the risks of informal project conduct and underscoring the need for disciplined, contract-driven administration to safeguard entitlements under FIDIC regimes.
How Should Cryptocurrency Losses be Valued? Singapore High Court Ties Damages to Mitigation
In a recent decision, the Singapore High Court clarified that cryptocurrency damages are to be valued based on when a claimant could reasonably mitigate losses—not at breach or trial—tying valuation firmly to mitigation principles.
THE LAST 365 DAYS IN THE DIFC COURTS
This paper serves as a one-stop consolidation of the year’s key developments across the DIFC judicial landscape. It brings together the insights explored in our earlier papers while extending the discussion to the Courts’ new laws & institutional reforms, jurisprudential developments......
The Evolving Landscape of Freestanding Injunctions in the DIFC
This paper explores the pivotal developments that have framed the DIFC Courts’ injunctive landscape over the past year.
Untangling Conflict of Jurisdiction between DIFC and Onshore Courts
This paper traces how Dubai’s dual-court system progression toward judicial comity and coordination over the past year. A key step in transforming the jurisdictional conflict mechanism was the replacement of the Joint Judicial Committee with the Conflict of Jurisdictions Tribunal.
The Act of State Doctrine and the DIFC’s Turn Toward Transnational Common Law
As part of Singularity’s experttalk initiative, we are pleased to present an Insight into THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE AND THE DIFC’S TURN TOWARD TRANSNATIONAL COMMON LAW. This continues our five-part series on the litigation framework in the DIFC over the last 365 days, in the run up to the DAW 2025.
JAL 2.0: The DIFC Courts Reboot
This paper is the first of a five-part series on the litigation framework in the DIFC over the last 365 days, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2025. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion on The Litigation Framework in the DIFC- The Last 365 Days on 10 November 2025.
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 & 37 of the Arbitration Act
In this alert, we analyse the Apex Court’s significant decision addressing the extent to which Indian courts may intervene in arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”).
Singularity Elevates Middle East Presence
Singularity Legal is pleased to announce the relocation of Natasha Kavalakkat, Managing Counsel, to its Dubai office as part of the firm’s strategic expansion in the Middle East.
A bankruptcy petition cannot be presented on the basis of an unrecognised foreign judgement
In this Alert, we have analyzed the recent decision of the UK Court of Appeal’s in "Servis-Terminal LLC v. Valeriy Ernestovich Drelle" , which clarifies that a bankruptcy petition cannot be based on an unrecognised foreign judgment.
Examining the Nuances of Contrasting Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Within the Same Agreement
This case interprets and construes seemingly two arbitration clauses within the same agreement, one providing a mandatory route and the other providing a permissive route. It highlights the importance of ensuring that dispute resolution clauses are drafted carefully.
Key Amendments In The Source And Interpretation Of DIFC Laws
The DIFC amended its Application Law to clarify the use of “DIFC Law,” now defined as statutory provisions and court decisions. Courts can reference common law, including English and other jurisdictions, and international model laws for interpretation.
Lexology recognizes Prateek Bagaria for his Arbitration & Commercial Litigation practise
We are proud to share that our Partner, Prateek Bagaria has been recognized as a Future Leader in Arbitration and recommended for his Commercial Litigation practice by Lexology Index in it’s ‘Commercial Litigation-Future Leaders-Partners’ index ranking for 2024.
DAW 2024: Litigation framework in the DIFC and its implications for global enforcement and recovery
Singularity is hosting a comprehensive 90 minute panel discussion on litigation framework in the DIFC and its implications for global enforcement and recovery strategies on 11 November, 2024 the opening day of the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024.
Enforcing against sovereigns in the DIFC : Navigating Immunity and Sanctions
This paper is the fourth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-a
Enforcement of Russian judgments under the Lugovoy Law in the DIFC
This paper is the sixth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-an
Remedies available in local courts on enforcement orders and judgements of the DIFC courts
This paper is the fifth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-an
Obtaining worldwide freezing orders in the DIFC: Freestanding and in aid of enforcement
This paper is the fourth of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-a
Enforcing interim measures in the DIFC
This paper is the third of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-an
DIFC Courts as a conduit for enforcement within and outside the UAE
This paper is the second of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion: https://www.singularitylegal.com/expert-talk/daw-2024-litigation-framework-in-the-difc-a
Remedies for non-compliance with non-money judgments: A Closer Look at Committal and Sequestration
This paper is the first of a seven-part series on DIFC litigation and global enforcement & recovery, in the run up to the Dubai Arbitration Week 2024. To find out more, please register for the panel discussion on the litigation framework in the DIFC and its implications for global enforcement and re
Demystifying the digital asset dispute resolution landscape
The webinar will explore best practices and solutions for resolving issues related to digital assets including cryptocurrencies, NFTs, DeFi, metaverse, and stablecoins. This discussion will involve an insightful overview of the latest issues, trends and jurisprudence relating to the these assets.
Singularity Legal
Top figures
3
Offices
15
Employees
2017
Established in
Content provided by Singularity Legal
