Robins Kaplan LLP, Litigation | Chambers USA Profile

About

Provided by Robins Kaplan LLP

We get the “business” in business litigation. No strangers to high-stakes, mission-critical litigation, our business litigation lawyers know how to litigate and efficiently resolve smaller cases with a view to the bottom line. Our clients include an enviable sampling of Fortune 500 regulars along with Midwest multi-nationals, technology superstars (and iconoclasts), and mom-and-pop success stories. Agile across a wide range of business sectors, we have developed particular depth serving entertainment, financial, food and beverage, insurance, manufacturing, and retail industry members as well as a nationally recognized government and internal investigations and patent litigation practices.

We know that all litigation comes with inherent risk and that our clients’ future often hinges on a case's outcome. That's why we partner with you to understand immediate and long-term business needs, then craft a combined litigation and business strategy designed to meet your company's best interests.

Chambers Review

Provided by Chambers

Litigation: General Commercial - Minnesota

Band 1

What the Team is Known For

Robins Kaplan has a prominent litigation group that handles high-profile cases in a wide range of areas, including healthcare, IP and financial services. It is also noted for its experience in appellate and class action litigation, including antitrust suits. Other noteworthy areas of expertise include breach of fiduciary duty, medical and entertainment-related litigation and employment law. The firm acts for both plaintiffs and defendants and is noted for its strong track record of major trial victories.

View ranking table

Work Highlights

Provided by Robins Kaplan LLP

Robins Kaplan represented the Trustee of the BMO Litigation Trust to defend a $564 million verdict before the Eighth Circuit arising out of the Tom Petters Ponzi scheme.

Strengths

Provided by Chambers

"Robins is a great firm that does a great job balancing the needs of the client. While important cases require time and effort, they did a good job not overstaffing cases and their technical skills on top, ahead and on point."