Professional Negligence

Simon Salzedo KC is formidably clever, very user-friendly and very sensible. He is remarkable and very good with numbers.

He's absolutely brilliant. Simon is so thorough in his research and is clear and compelling in his advocacy.

Simon Salzedo KC is the best in the market for dealing with issues relating to difficult accountancy issues. He's on the leading cases and has a great style in court: clever but accessible and clear.

He has huge gravitas but is also very easy to work with.

Mark Howard KC is top of his game for professional negligence.

His performance in court is outstanding.

Tim Lord KC is the best cross-examiner, I've never seen someone get in people's heads in the witness box so much.

Tim Lord KC is very aggressive but effective at the same time.

Tim is a fantastic trial lawyer.

Tom Adam KC delivers analysis that is second to none and puts forward his analysis in a straightforward and comprehensible manner.

Tom is a very good commercial practitioner across the board.

Tom Adam KC has a very effective advocacy style. He appears very affable but has a knife under his cloak.

Charles Hollander KC is easy to work with. He is very good in front of the tribunal; he sits as a deputy so he knows which buttons to push.

Charles is great. He is succinct and to the point, and unafraid to give a firm view.

Charles is very good on the law. He is very affable and good with the judge.

Thomas Plewman KC is very good. He was once an accountant so trades off that.

Thomas is very good. His judgement is excellent, and his knowledge of accountancy matters is really good.

He is one of the top silks in the area of accountancy defence. Thomas has an encyclopedic knowledge of relevant rules and standards, and a huge amount of experience in these claims.

Tony Singla KC is really good at presenting things in a calm and measured way, it comes through really well.

Tony Singla KC is one of the cleverest silks at the Bar. He is a very effective cross-examiner.

Tony Singla KC is extremely sound; I've worked with him on complicated and high-profile cases. He's nice to work with, and his analysis of complex issues is considered and reliable.

Kyle Lawson does the heavy lifting and is an excellent choice for complex banking instrument and professional negligence cases.

In addition to his technical excellence, Kyle Lawson is well liked by clients and instructing solicitors alike.

Kyle Lawson is extremely user-friendly and works as part of our team. He gives enormously sound advice and grasp of complex matters and is dependable.

Sophie Shaw is very clever, decisive and you know you are going to get a quality work product.

Sophie Shaw is really excellent. She is highly effective and presents legal arguments extremely well.

Sophie Shaw is one of those people who you see and know has got it. She's meticulously organised and nice too.

Jonathan is incredibly bright and excellent on paper. He works incredibly hard, so he is great to have on a big case where he does a lot of heavy lifting and analysis of huge amounts of data.

Jonathan Scott is really clever and writes beautifully.

Tom Wood has gravitas beyond his year of call. He was unfailingly reliable.