Department profile
Latham & Watkins LLP

Intellectual Property: Litigation

USA Guide 2026 : District of Columbia


Latham & Watkins LLP

Rankings

Chambers Review

Provided by Chambers

Intellectual Property: Litigation - District of Columbia

Band 1

Band 1


What the Team is Known For

Latham & Watkins offers high-caliber patent litigators known to act for clients in a variety of sectors, including software, life sciences and automobiles. The firm houses strong PTAB, district court and ITC trial capabilities backed up by a number of experienced appellate advocates who regularly appear before the US Supreme Court and federal appeals courts. It is also adept at handling all manner of Section 101 cases and engages regularly with corresponding issues and new developments. The team is also noted for its expertise in cases at the intersection between antitrust and IP.

Work Highlights

Provided by Chambers

  • Latham & Watkins LLP represented Sarepta Therapeutics and The University of Western Australia in a patent litigation case brought by Nippon. The court found Nippon's patent invalid and awarded Sarepta $115.2 million in damages.

Strengths

Provided by Chambers

  • The Latham & Watkins team is always responsive, available and does not leave any stone unturned.

    Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • Latham & Watkins advises on risks in a manner that is consistent and related to business needs.

    Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • The Latham & Watkins team is strategic and looks for creative ways to solve issues.

    Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • Latham & Watkins delivers on planning long-term litigation strategy.

    Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA

Notable Practitioners

Provided by Chambers

  • Band 1Matt Moore
    Band 1Matt Moore

    Matt Moore

    Matt Moore maintains an impressive litigation practice that frequently sees him act on complex disputes for a client base that includes automobile manufacturers and technology companies.

    • Matt is incredibly smart and knowledgeable. He is also creative in the way that he looks at the law and all of his advice is filtered through the lens of business management.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • He is a real dynamo in terms of client relationships.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Matt is a top litigator who gets results.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Matt is good at finding strategy and herding a team.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • Band 1Michael Morin
    Band 1Michael Morin

    Michael Morin

    Michael Morin routinely acts in patent disputes involving pharmaceuticals and complex technology.
    • He builds good teams and is excellent with clients.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Michael has an excellent ability to digest complicated scientific, patent issues and make them understandable to a jury.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Michael is an excellent strategist and brief writer.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Michael is a brilliant litigator and trial attorney, who is really smart and quick on his feet.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • Band 1Sy Damle
    Band 1Sy Damle

    Sy Damle

    Sy Damle offers substantial experience in litigating high-value copyright disputes. He is frequently called upon by an impressive list of leading technology companies, and is a leading attorney in the intersection between intellectual property and artificial intelligence.

    • Sy is an expert on what is happening in the market.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Sy has a great strategic mind on copyright issues.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Sy is very specialized in the copyright space.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Sy is a deep thinker with expertise in copyright work. He understands how to provide crisp and helpful guidance with innovative scenarios that exceed the current legal landscape.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • Band 3Tara D. Elliott
    Band 3Tara D. Elliott

    Tara D. Elliott

    Tara Elliott's broad IP practice sees her successfully represent clients across a wide range of industries, including technology, retail and manufacturing. Tara is also trusted by clients in copyright disputes and software patent court proceedings.

    • Her legal analysis and communication skills stand out.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • She is the perfect blend of high-level thinking and specific knowledge related to the law and the case facts.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Her ability to tailor arguments in a way that resonates to a particular judge is standout.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Tara is a top-notch lawyer. She is an extremely skilled oral advocate. Where she really shines is being able to understand client needs and objectives and strategically approaching the legal matter with that lens.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
  • Band 4Kevin Wheeler
    Band 4Kevin Wheeler

    Kevin Wheeler

    Kevin Wheeler's intellectual property dispute practice sees him litigate in multiple venues, including before the ITC and in various district courts. With strong cross-border work, Kevin comfortably represents clients in multiple industries.

    • Kevin is a good advocate on his feet.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA
    • Kevin is smart, friendly and always responsive.

      Intellectual Property: Litigation respondentUSA

Ranked Individuals at Latham & Watkins LLP (5)

District of Columbia

Latham & Watkins LLP has rankings in the following guides

What success is built on

Chambers is the leading data and intelligence partner for the legal sector.

Explore thought leadership