Original Source: China Business Law Journal

It is often difficult to give any warnings regarding the criminal liability of mergers and acquisitions in the usual process of due diligence. This article aims to briefly discuss the criminal liability in mergers and acquisitions of listed companies with examples of insider trading and disclosure of insider information.

Acquisition of equity is one of the most common methods for mergers and acquisitions of listed companies. In terms of transaction structure, the acquisitions of equity can happen in different forms. In terms of effects on the stock market, any forms of equity acquisitions can lead to material fluctuations of stock prices of targeted companies, the acquirers or affiliated companies.

Before the disclosure of such transactions to the public, this kind of information, which can lead to material fluctuations on the stock market, would be considered sensitive information, or in other words, insider information. The Criminal Law classifies the deliberate release of insider information or the illicit use of insider information in the execution of securities transactions as a criminal offence. This is a breach of the legal provisions of insider trading or disclosure of insider information under article 180 of the Criminal Law.

Identification of the offence

Subject of crime. Under the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 180 of the Criminal Law, the subject of the crime of insider trading and disclosure of insider information would be the related officers with insider information and personnel who have illegally obtained such insider information. As such an accusation would be blank facts about a crime, the identification of the subject of such crime would need to take into consideration other disciplines of legal compliance.

In general, related personnel defined under the provisions of article 74 of the Securities Law, and under the provisions of item 12 of article 85 of the Regulation on the Administration of Futures Trading, and article 2 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases of Engaging in Insider Trading or Leaking Insider Information, are identified as personnel with insider information. Under the provisions of article 4 of the above interpretation, such personnel should be identified as having illegally obtained insider information.

In November 2011, the China Securities Regulatory Commission issued the Provisions regarding the Compliance of Listed Companies in Managing the Registration of Personnel with Insider Information. Such registered personnel are obviously personnel with insider information according to paragraph 1 of article 180 of the Criminal Law. On the other hand, unregistered personnel with such information can also be regarded as related personnel with insider information in the sense of criminal law. Companies can also be considered as subject of crime in the same sense.

Identification range. The Criminal Law itself has not directly identified the range of insider information. The identification of the range of insider information should take reference from the Securities Law, the Regulation on the Administration of Futures Trading, and other related legal disciplines. According to article 75 of the Securities Law, insider information refers to the undisclosed information that can have a material impact on the stock prices of such companies and/or information related to the management and the financials of such companies.

For this, scholars in China often classify insider information as information with three characteristics: significance, confidentiality and relevance. Information related to the mergers and acquisitions of listed companies that could have a material impact on stock prices is certainly insider information. Intentional disclosure of information related to the merger and acquisitions of listed companies or illicit use of such information in the execution of securities trading can also be an offence of insider trading or disclosure of insider information.

Sensitive period. Insider information is time-sensitive. Once the insider information is legally disclosed, the issues of insider trading and disclosure of insider information would no longer exist. According to the judicial interpretation of the provisions, the sensitive period of insider information refers to the period from which the insider information is formed to the time when such information is disclosed.

The disclosure time is easy to define. It is the time when the insider information is disclosed on the press and websites designated by the securities and futures regulatory institutions. However, the time when the insider information is formed would be relatively difficult to define.

This article defines the formation time of insider information as early as the time when such insider information is proposed. According to the judicial interpretations, the time that marks the start of relevant proposals, plans, decisions or execution that affect the formation of insider information should be considered as the time when insider information is formed.

Although the judicial interpretation has listed proposal, planning, decision and execution of insider information all together, the process of formation of such insider information until its disclosure, which includes proposal, planning, decision and execution, are in reality four different stages. In general, the sensitive period of insider information starts from its proposal and often includes the above four stages.

Penalties

Under the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 180 of the Criminal Law, the execution of insider trading and the act of disclosing insider information can lead to imprisonment or criminal detention for up to five years, or a fine of more than five times the illegal gains, if circumstances are serious. If the circumstances are especially serious, the offence can lead to five to 10 years imprisonment and a fine of double to five times the illegal gains.

According to articles 6 and 7 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases of Engaging in Insider Trading or Leaking Insider Information, the judging criteria for serious and especially serious circumstances are defined with respect to the amount involved in the securities transactions, futures margin, and profits or losses avoided.

Cases of multiple insider trading transactions or deliberate disclosures of insider information, including those that may not have gone through administrative or criminal processing, should be calculated accumulatively.

对于上市公司并购过程中的刑事法律风险,通常意义上的法律尽职调查难以进行预警和提示。本文将以内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪为例,简述上市公司并购中存在的刑事法律风险。

股权收购是上市公司并购的主要方式之一。从交易结构而言,股权收购的形式可以是多种多样的。从对股票价格的影响而言,任何形式的股权收购均会造成目标公司、收购公司或者关联公司股票价格的大幅波动。

在尚未向公众披露之前,这种可以引起股票价格大幅波动的信息被视为股票价格敏感信息,又称为内幕信息。

《刑法》将故意泄露内幕信息或者非法利用内幕信息进行证券交易的行为规定为犯罪,即《刑法》第180条规定的内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪。

罪行认定

犯罪主体

《刑法》第180条第1款之规定,内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪的犯罪主体为内幕信息的知情人员及非法获取内幕信息的人员。因为本罪的罪状为空白罪状,对于犯罪主体的具体认定需要参考其他法律法规。

一般而言,《证券法》第74条规定的人员、《期货交易管理条例》第85条第12项规定的人员以及《关于办理内幕交易、泄露内幕信息刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第二条规定的人员,应当认定为内幕信息的知情人员。上述《解释》第四条规定的人员应当认定为非法获取
内幕信息的人员。

2011年11月证监会颁布了《关于上市公司建立内幕信息知情人登记管理制度的规定》,对于已登记的内幕信息知情人均可认定为《刑法》第180条第1款规定的内幕信息的知情人员自不待言,同时未登记的内幕信息知情人也可称为刑法意义上的内幕信息知情人员。同时,刑法意义上的单位也可成为本罪的主体。

认定范围

《刑法》本身并未直接规定内幕信息的范围。对于内幕信息的认定范围应当参照《证券法》、《期货交易管理条例》等相关法律及行政法规。

根据《证券法》第75条规定,内幕信息是指涉及公司的经营、财务或者对该公司证券的市场价格有重大影响的尚未公开的信息。

据此,中国学者通常认为内幕信息应具有重要性、秘密性与相关性等三个特征。可能对上市公司的股价造成较大影响的上市公司并购方案当然属于内幕信息。故意泄露涉及上市公司的并购方案的信息或者非法利用该信息进行证券、期货交易的可能构成内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪。

敏感期

内幕信息具有时间性。在内幕信息被依法披露之后,即不存在泄露内幕信息及利用内幕信息交易的问题。根据司法解释的规定,内幕信息敏感期是指内幕信息自形成至公开的期间。内幕信息的公开时间较为容易确定,内幕信息在国务院证券、期货监督管理机构指定的报刊、网站等媒体披露的时间即为内幕信息的公开时间。但是,内幕信息的形成时间的界定则相对困难。

本文将内幕信息形成的动议作为内幕信息最早形成时间。司法解释规定,影响内幕信息形成的动议、筹划、决策或者执行人员,其动议、筹划、决策或者执行初始时间,应当认定为内幕信息的形成时间。

虽然司法解释将内幕信息的动议、筹划、决策及执行并列列举。但是,从内幕信息由产生到公布的过程来看,动议、筹划、决策及执行等四个阶段正是内幕信息从产生到公布应当经过的不同的时间段。一般而言,一项内幕信息的敏感期起始于动议,并会包含以上四个阶段。

处罚规定

《刑法》第180条第1款规定,实施内幕交易、泄露内幕信息行为,情节严重的,处五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役,并处或者单处非法所得一倍以上五倍以下的罚金;情节特别严重的,处五年以上十年以下有期徒刑,并处非法所得一倍以上五倍以下罚金。

《关于办理内幕交易、泄露内幕信息刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第六条及第七条分别从证券交易额、期货交易占用保证金数额、获利或者避免损失额等方面规定了情节严重、情节特别严重的判断标准。

对于多次实施内幕交易或者泄露内幕信息行为,未经行政处理或者刑事处理的,应当对相关交易数额累计依法计算。