Cassia Furman
USA Guide 2023
Band 4 : Cannabis Law: Western United States
Share profile
Band 4
About
Provided by Cassia Furman
Practice Areas
- Corporate & Business
- Commercial Transactions
- Government & Policy
- Land Use & Zoning
- Licensing
- Real Estate
- Regulatory Compliance
Career
Cassia Furman is an equity partner and Executive Board member of leading cannabis law firm Vicente Sederberg LLP. In addition to her firm management role, she leads the firm’s California Practice Group based in Los Angeles, where she counsels clients on a wide range of transactional, regulatory, and land use issues related to the cannabis industry.
Cassia specializes in the intersection of local and state regulation and private industry, having worked on both the public and private sides of the negotiating table. Her background in public finance, land use planning, local government law, and commercial real estate provides insight into all phases of cannabis permitting and licensed operations. In addition to regulatory work, she focuses on cannabis supply chain transactions, working tirelessly to help her clients meet and exceed their business goals in an ever-changing landscape.
Professional Memberships
- International Cannabis Bar Association
- California Cannabis Industry Association
- Los Angeles County Bar Association
Publications
The Cannabis Business: Understanding Law, Finance, and Governance in America's Newest Industry, Routledge Publishing
Articles, highlights and press releases
1 item provided by Vicente LLP
Cannabis Crossing State Lines: California Dept. of Cannabis Control Pushes for Interstate Commerce
California’s legislation is not the first of its kind and follows on the heels of Oregon’s SB 582 way back in 2019. While the authorization for interstate agreements is generally focused on Federal legalization, implementing them now could be just the boost state-legal operators need at a time when
Cannabis Crossing State Lines: California Dept. of Cannabis Control Pushes for Interstate Commerce
California’s legislation is not the first of its kind and follows on the heels of Oregon’s SB 582 way back in 2019. While the authorization for interstate agreements is generally focused on Federal legalization, implementing them now could be just the boost state-legal operators need at a time when