Ranking tables

Social Housing | UK Bar

Midlands (Bar)

These barristers act for either the providers or consumers of social housing. This can comprise corporate work - governance, joint ventures etc - housing stock transfers, antisocial behaviour matters, construction or redevelopment financing, property issues, or defending social housing tenants against legal proceedings brought by the providers.

Rankings overview for Sets

All Sets profiles

1

Band 1

  1. St Ives Chambers
    1
    St Ives Chambers
    Social Housing
    2025 | Band 1 | 11 Years Ranked
    St Ives Chambers represents a wide range of housing clients in the full spectrum of different housing issues in the Midlands. The set remains pre-eminent in this market, and its barristers act in complex possession proceedings and anti-social behaviour injunctions, in addition to other related matters. One client notes: "The members of the St Ives Chambers' social housing team are experts in the field. The barristers are reliable and practical." Another client says: "St Ives Chambers has a dedicated set of barristers who specialise in social housing management." A particular work highlight for this year is the representation of Brighter Places concerning a Suspended Possession Order.
2

Band 2

  1. St Philips Chambers
    2
    St Philips Chambers
    Social Housing
    2025 | Band 2 | 1 Years Ranked
    St Philips Chambers is highlighted for its growing offering in social housing management. Its barristers are experienced in handling cases at all levels of court, including those disputes involving the ECHR. The set's members represent local authorities and landlords in possession claims involving disability discrimination and injunctions pertaining to anti-social behaviour. Interviewees enthuse: "The level of knowledge, even in the junior members of the team, is strong and they are capable of handling any matter." Another source states: "St Philips Chambers offers a full range of expertise." Among the set's significant cases is Wolverhampton City Council and others v London Gypsies and Travellers and others, which saw the Supreme Court rule that the court had jurisdiction to grant the newcomer injunction.
  2. 4-5 Gray's Inn Square
    Social Housing
    2025 | Band 2