/Home/USA: Spotlight/Insurance in Los Angeles/Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP
View profile of Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP
Department profile
Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP
Department profile | Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP
Insurance

About

Provided by Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP

Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP was founded in 1947 on the core principles of providing thoughtful, resourceful and effective legal work. These core principles continue to guide the Firm in its proactive approach to resolving matters. With decades of experience in all aspects of civil litigation and insurance coverage, the Firm’s strategic size enables seamless collaboration by attorneys in delivering exceptional legal services to clients in a wide variety of industries in multiple jurisdictions. From the Firm's headquarters in Los Angeles, the Firm's attorneys provide robust services to clients throughout California. With satellite offices in Las Vegas and Phoenix, the Firm is further able to serve its clients in Nevada and Arizona. The Firm's notable practice areas include Appellate; Business & Financial Institutions; Casualty; Civil Litigation; Constitutional Law; Education, Colleges & Universities; Fidelity, Surety & Specialty Coverages; Insurance Coverage & Bad Faith Litigation; Labor & Employment; Lender Liability; Professional Liability; Real Property, Title & Escrow and Real Property.

Chambers Review

Provided by Chambers

Insurance - Los Angeles

Spotlight

What the Team is Known For

Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP is a top insurance firm headquartered in Los Angeles and able to handle a broad range of insurance coverage and litigation issues. The firm expertly advises on insurance bad faith, coverage, and litigation matters across multiple practice areas. The firm has particular experience handling complex coverage disputes in state and federal courts.

Notable practitioners

Vanessa Widener is a key contact.

Work Highlights

  • Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP successfully represented a real estate owner in defeating plaintiffs' claims seeking to enforce an alleged equitable servitude to enjoin the owner from exercising the right to use, enjoy and develop its privately owned land.