Enforcing Non-Compete Agreements in the UAE: Key Considerations and Practical Challenges

Maroun Abou Harb of BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates examines non-compete agreements in freezones like Media City and Internet City, focusing on their enforceability and factors influencing their effectiveness. The article discusses the legal framework, challenges to enforceability, and key considerations for both employers and employees involved in such agreements.

Published on 15 July 2024
Maroun Abou Harb, BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates
Maroun Abou Harb
View firm profile

Non-compete Agreements in Freezones Such as Media City and Internet City

From a legal standpoint, non-compete agreements in these freezones aim to protect an employer’s legitimate business interests, such as confidential information, client relationships, and goodwill. These agreements typically restrict employees, particularly in media-related fields like advertising, PR, and journalism, from working for a competing company within the same freezone or a nearby area for a specific period of time after leaving their current role. However, the enforceability of these agreements depends on several factors, including:

  • Reasonableness of restrictions: The timeframe and scope of the non-compete clause must be reasonable. Courts generally frown upon overly broad restrictions that significantly limit an employee’s ability to find new employment.
  • Protection of legitimate interests: The non-compete clause should safeguard a legitimate business interest, such as trade secrets or unique client relationships.
  • Specificity of roles: The agreement should clearly define the restricted roles and activities to avoid ambiguity.

Non-competes for Tech Roles

Non-competes are less common for tech jobs in these freezones. However, they can be implemented for highly specialised roles where the employee possesses unique knowledge or access to confidential information critical to the company’s competitive edge.

Factors Affecting the Enforceability of Non-Compete Agreements in the UAE

Enforceability challenges

Non-compete agreements in the UAE can face challenges regarding their enforceability. Courts may scrutinise the terms to ensure they are reasonable and necessary to protect legitimate business interests, which can lead parties to question their effectiveness.

Ambiguous language

Poorly drafted non-compete clauses with unclear terms or ambiguous language can create confusion about what actions are prohibited. This lack of clarity weakens the perceived strength of the agreements.

Practical hurdles

Enforcing a non-compete agreement in the UAE can be complex and resource-intensive. Gathering evidence and navigating legal procedures can be time-consuming and costly, making parties hesitant to pursue legal action.

Market dynamics

In the UAE’s dynamic business environment, where talent mobility is valued, companies may be cautious about aggressively enforcing non-compete clauses. They may fear negative repercussions on their reputation or difficulties attracting skilled employees.

Cost of legal action

While the cost of legal action is a consideration, it is part of a broader context that includes legal complexities, practical challenges, and market dynamics shaping the perception and enforcement of non-compete agreements in the UAE. Well-drafted agreements aligned with UAE laws and tailored to specific business needs are more likely to be taken seriously and upheld if challenged.

Employee breach

If an employee violates a valid non-compete clause, the employer may seek an injunction to prevent them from working for the competitor. They could also pursue damages for any financial losses incurred due to the breach.

Employer overreach

If an employer enforces an overly broad or unreasonable non-compete clause, the employee could challenge it in court. This could result in the clause being declared unenforceable.

Key Considerations for Enforcing Non-Compete Agreements in Court

Enforcing a non-compete agreement requires the employer to demonstrate several key points in court:

  • Valid agreement: The agreement must be signed by both parties and comply with freezone regulations.
  • Substantive harm: The employer must show that the employee’s new position poses a genuine threat to their legitimate business interests.
  • Reasonableness of restrictions: The court will assess whether the timeframe and scope of the non-compete are reasonable in light of the employee’s role and the specific industry.

“The effectiveness of non-compete agreements can vary widely depending on jurisdiction, industry, and specific circumstances”.

Conclusion

Regarding non-compete agreements, it is essential to recognise that their effectiveness and perception can vary widely depending on jurisdiction, industry, and specific circumstances. What works in one context might not be suitable for another. Therefore, it is crucial for both employers and employees to understand the legal framework governing non-competes in their respective areas and to approach these agreements with diligence and clarity.

Additionally, ongoing dialogue and legal updates can help refine and improve the enforceability of non-compete agreements, striking a balance between protecting business interests and respecting individual rights. Collaborative efforts between legal professionals, industry experts, and policymakers can contribute to creating fair and effective practices regarding non-compete agreements.

BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates

BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates, firm logo, Expert Focus contributor
5 ranked departments and 3 ranked lawyers

Learn more about the firm's ranking in Chambers Global 2024

View firm profile

Chambers In Focus Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter and never miss out on thought leadership content from legal experts and the key stories driving the legal profession forward.
Sign up here