Share profile
Band 2
Provided by Howard Watkinson
Howard is one of the only leading juniors at the tax bar with experience in both civil and criminal courts, and tax tribunals.
Howard appeared in the Pfizer litigation before the CJEU (Pfizer [2020] EUECJ C-182/19) and in three important indirect tax cases in the Court of Appeal recently: Eynsham Cricket Club v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 225 (charity VAT), Munir v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 799 (impact of criminal convictions on excise duty assessments), and Tower Bridge GP Ltd v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 998 (the leading case on invalid VAT invoices).
Howard has appeared in several important High Court, UT and FTT decisions recently on cases covering: human rights and freezing orders (HMRC v Malde [2023] EWHC 1188 (Ch)), judicial review for legitimate expectation (Airline Placement Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v HMRC [2023] EWHC 1191 (Admin)), VAT deregistration (Nourish Training Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v HMRC [2023] EWHC 350 (Admin), Impact Contracting Solutions Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKUT 215 (TCC)), public authority VAT exemptions (Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v HMRC [2022] UKUT 267 (TCC), VAT exemptions for food, buildings, philanthropic organisations and charities, and VAT penalties.
Provided by Chambers
Howard Watkinson has significant experience handling cases concerning a wide variety of VAT issues. He is also expert in civil and criminal fraud cases associated with VAT and excise and customs duties.
Provided by Chambers
Howard Watkinson is very good. Clients like him.
Approachable, extremely good with clients and someone who displays excellent attention to detail.
Howard Watkinson is very good. Clients like him.
Approachable, extremely good with clients and someone who displays excellent attention to detail.