DEI Awards FAQs

Learn more about Chambers and Partners DEI Award submissions and how your firm can be recognised in the legal market as a practice driving forward the importance of DEI.

Published on 7 May 2024
Luke Vincett Chambers Diversity & Inclusion Author
Luke Vincett

Chambers DEI Awards

For over a decade, the Chambers DEI Awards have marked, celebrated and showcased the best in DEI, pro bono, CSR and environmental work from firms around the world. Having originally launched as Women in Law Awards in the USA, we now hold DEI Awards in six different jurisdictions, including Latin America, Brazil, Europe, Asia Pacific and the UK Bar.

Every year we receive hundreds of thousands of words in applications from firms across our different categories. With firms frequently dedicating significant time to filling out the nominations, we receive questions on everything from simple procedures to comprehensive enquiries about how we assess the information.

With this in mind, our two DEI Managers (who lead the shortlisting process) sat down to discuss how they winnow down the hundreds of submissions, including their top tips, key pitfalls they often see and how to make your application stand out.

You receive hundreds of submissions in each jurisdiction: how do you even begin to sort through these?

Honestly it’s a big task, but you can’t help but be inspired reading about the incredible work the legal community has been doing over the last year. We know that the individuals and firms that submit share our immense passion for creating a more diverse, inclusive and equitable society and so are committed to ensuring we give each heartfelt nomination it’s due consideration.

Fundamentally we always return to the five criteria which every submission is judged by, detailed on our submission guidelines. Each application receives a mark out of ten for its breadth, commitment, impact, advancement and originality (expanded on below), with the highest overall marks considered for our shortlist. 

  • Breadth: the degree to which the initiative spanned different strands of diversity and protected groups. Breadth can also refer to the extent to which the initiative covered different jurisdictions, practice areas, and career progression.
  • Commitment: the degree to which the initiative went beyond normal practice and work remit. Commitment can also refer to the percentage of individuals at the firm who were involved and/or the number of hours dedicated to an initiative.
  • Impact: the degree to which individuals, the firm and/or the wider community is positively affected by the initiative. The best submissions will be able to detail evidence of the impact that their initiative has had.
  • Advancement: the degree to which the work advanced diversity and inclusion in terms of recruitment, retention and promotion (statistics for comparison would be useful here) as well as organisational, procedural and structural change. For categories not focused on DEI - such as pro bono, veterans, corporate social responsibility and environment and sustainability – advancement can refer to the degree to which the named cause is advanced.
  • Originality: the degree to which the work involved innovative solutions, original programs, processes and procedures, or tackled issues that had not previously been foremost in the firm/individuals remit, or are addressing issues that are not commonly part of the DEI conversation. 

Is there a moderation procedure?

A random selection of the nominations in each category are moderated by another member of the team to ensure the marks are fair. At this stage we also bring in the written statements from referees, which might affect the scores (particularly around impact). From there, we decide on the shortlist of nominees who exemplify best in class work.

What makes a nomination stand out to you?

When it actually tackles all five areas! The nominations which invariably make it to the shortlist are those which demonstrate excellence in every area we assess. It’s worth remembering that the level of commitment to DEI has increased significantly in recent years, so the bar is set tremendously high. With such fierce competition, careful attention to the criteria really does pay off.

Nominations also need to actively talk about the outcomes of initiatives. This fits into both the Impact and Advancement criteria, and can be demonstrated through statistics or testimonials (either quantitative or qualitative data).

Are there any frequent pitfalls you see on nominations?

Yes! To start with, we frequently see nominations that are too long, and to ensure fairness we’re only able to assess the information provided within the word limit. It wouldn’t be right for us to consider anything above 1,000 and that often that means that some of a nominations most interesting work cannot be considered.

Some nominations also focus on the history of a programme or an individual’s work, as opposed to what’s been done in the last twelve months. While we welcome some context, our Awards run annually so we predominantly focus on the last year’s activity.

Another oddity is nominations that include no more than a sentence or two of supporting information. As we’ve said, the competition is incredibly strong so it’s really impossible for such a nomination to make the shortlist.

Lastly, some nominations go into significant detail about the core legal practice of an individual. While it always makes interesting reading, the day-to-day practice of nominees does not count towards the awards we judge. Overall, we highly advise firms to read the nomination guidelines! It’s usually very clear when firms have done this and their submissions absolutely stand out from the crowd.

You must get submissions from firms of all sizes, and initiatives of all levels of maturity – how do you ensure work is treated fairly when there are so many variables?

We’re absolutely passionate about ensuring the awards process runs as equitably as possible. With this in mind, we’ve introduced questions asking about firm size and the number of legal and non-legal staff to ensure we can be as fair as possible. Our team carefully consider the relevant variables, and do our best to ensure individuals and firms at all stages of their journey are appropriately recognised.

So that’s the shortlist: how do you decide on the winners?

First we take some time away from the material, so that we’re able to approach it with fresh eyes for that crucial final stage. When we return to the shortlist, the team will reread the submissions and referee statements for each of the top contenders. What follows is a spirited debate between the team: while the final three are decided by the numerical scores the last stage of the process comes down to the expertise of our team. We also work closely with our practice area research teams to utilise their deep knowledge of the market.

Does it cost to submit to the DEI Categories?

No, there is no cost to participate.

Will our submission in the DEI Categories affect our overall rankings or other Award decisions?

Participation in the DEI Categories will not affect your overall rankings or other Award decisions.

Why do you ask for Client Referees? How is that information used?

Testimonials and quotes from Client Referees are used to judge submissions that we are considering for the shortlist. Accordingly, we highly recommend firms take the time to include a quote: this makes the submission far more competitive.

We require five client references in total for each submission, not five for each category. It’s helpful to note whether a referee is for a specific category or for multiple awards.

As with all referees submitted to Chambers, whether for the DEI Awards or in our regular practice area submission process, these details are treated with the highest level of confidentiality.

Can I submit two individuals for one award?

Unfortunately not! Firms need to decide on one individual for each category who they think has achieved above and beyond on DEI work over the last year.

The one exception to this would be where team members have jointly run a programme, who firms might want to submit together. However the strongest applications invariably involve individuals who have contributed to the legal community across multiple projects or programmes, so we’d encourage firms to consider other work each of the individuals in question and whether, bearing that in mind, a nomination for one might be stronger.

How can my team/firm get more involved?

Unsurprisingly, the best way to get involved is by filling out the nomination! Whether it’s your first year or you’ve submitted every year, we always encourage participation.

You can also collaborate with Chambers through sponsorship of the Awards or a seminar around the ceremony. With the most passionate and engaged diversity advocates from across the legal community in one space, it’s an opportunity not to be missed.